Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
The FairfieldMRRORV Volume 13, No. 15 Our Second Decade Thursday, February 23, 1989 "Happy Pearl Harbor Day" Kurtzman Details Ethical Dilemmas of the Journalist Lynn Ann Casey Assistant Editor "It isn't easy to see who is telling the truth." "It is necessary forjournalists to regard everything they are told with a grain of salt." Journalists are faced with ethical dilemmas every day in their pro-fession. This was the topic of Joel Kurtzman, Business and Financial Journalist of the New York Times on February 14. In "Media and Business: The Ethical Dilemmas," the inau-gural lecture of the John Winthrop Wright Lecture Series, Kurtzman addressed the problems that come along with the journalism profes-sion. "The idea of studying busi-ness ethics is long overdue," said Kurtzman in praise of the series. , Kurtzman calls ethics "those values that enable us to a common good." Journalists are trained to be skeptics and, despite the ethical barriers and obstacles in their path, they must "find the truth." Kurt-zman has seen this in his experi-ence at theNew York Times as well as in other endeavors in writing. Dr. Keith Martin* of the School ofBusiness at Fairfield Uni-versity, introduced Kurtzman, naming the many accomplishments of the weekly columnist. A gradu-ate of the University of California at Berkeley in 1970, Kurtzman went on to get his masters at the University of Houston. He has founded a scholarly journal, worked as a consultant to Toyota, has forecasted the debt crisis in the Third World, and has lectured at many other universities, including Oxford and Georgetown. Kurt-zman is also the author of thirteen books. The columnist feels that ethics is "a code of objectivity" and he exemplified this specifi-cally with the policies ofthe Times. All journalists at the New York Times must make a pledge when they begin theirj obs to stand above temptation in return for a promise oflifetime employment. Kurtzman feels that this encourages journal-ists even more to stand by their ethical code. "Without the media, it would be a quiet world," com-mented Kurtzman. But, the es-sence of the media includes the reporting offacts to the public. The journalist has the responsibility to distinguish the facts "even if it goes against theirown ideology." Journalists must ignore their opin-ions and biases to report the facts objectively. A journalist can interview sometimes up to 30 people for one story. But, according to Kurtzman, "the chances are quite high that he (the journalist) is being manipu-lated or simply lied to." The jour-nalist must "look past the hype to ascertain the truth." Before a story is published at the New York Times, it can go through as many as seven layers of editing. The process, though, does happen quickly and "errors do get through." These layers are neces-sary to "remove our prejudice and ideology." Despite this, the layers and care taken,'with each article is subject to criticism. Kurtzman discussed public relations and the relation of such departments and companies to the newspaper media. These compa-nies can be a temptation to jounal-ists because they often offer trips, meals, and other perks to jounal-ists. But, at the Times, said Kurt-zman, "we pay our own way." Care must be taken because public rela-tions people are trained to manage the media, and many are experts at theirjob. Therefore, reporters must develop "delicate relationships with public relations agencies because these agencies can deter-mine what we know about the truth." "It is the very critical issues that make journalism an interest-ing profession." The profesison is "subject to bribes and high-pow-ered propaganda." As ajournalist, Kurtzman said he must "live by my code and make sure my sources are the right ones." Kurtzman concluded by saying that, "we must ask ourselves tough questions and it can be tiring and wrenching, but it also can be a hell of a lot of fun." Novelist Analyzes Roots of American Revolution Christine Doody Staff Writer The fourth lecture in the Revolution Lecture Series was held on Monday, February 13th, at 8 pm in the Nursing Auditorium. The guest speaker, novelist Howard Fast, spoke on the meaning of revolution in America. Howard Fast began writing in 1933 and has since written over fifty historical novels ranging in subject matter from ancient Egypt to 20th Century America. How-ever, his main focus in many nov-els has been on the American Revolution. Fast began the lecture by creating an image ofa wheel where there was something at the top and something different at the bottom. He said that for a valid revolution to occur, that which was once on the top must descend to the lower part of the wheel, while that which was once on the bottom must ro-tate upward, achieving the top position. As a result of the Glorious Revolution, Fast explained, the English throne was weakened and "it exercised it's power in North America with the conjection ofthe English mercantile community." He stated that in America there were particularly four groups, representing different industries and classes, that were ready to revolt against the conditions that prevented them from progressing. He categorized them as the indus-trial workers, the farmers, the people on the frontier, and the upper class Americans. The industrial workers in-cluded carpenters, shipbuilders, glass makers, and specifically the Rope Walkers, those who manu-factured rope. Their main objec-tion to British rule was to the vari-ous Acts that Parliament passed, most of which strongly discour-aged trade with any other nation other than Great Britain. In many cases, the colonies were permitted to produce goods, but those goods could only be sold within the colonies or to England. Fast pointed out that the industrial workers were among the very first to revolt because Britain "got in their way all the time." The second group Fast mentioned was the farmers. Amer-ica during the time of the Revolu-tion was a great agricultural soci-ety; plantations were numerous. However, most of the land was owned by the king, not the colo-nists. For the farmers, owning property meant freedom and wealth as well as a field on which to plant crops. Thirdly, Fast noted that the people on the frontier were also unhappy with land restrictions that the throne enforced. Frontier people would travel through the wilderness and settle in an area with hopes that the crown wouldn't locate them. However, the king's soldiers, allied with the Indians, usually managed to find them. Hostility between the crown and the colonies increased with the fourth group Fast discussed - the upper class Americans. This cate-gory included people such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson who were educated, well-read, and land owners. Fast used Washington as an example to illustrate how tensions were created. Fast explained how Washington sent barrels oftobacco which were produced on his plan-tation to London, along with a list of goods he needed and sometimes wanted in exchange forhis tobacco. Fast described Washington as one "who never had a dollar in his pocket," for England never gave him a cash payment for his crop. Fast continued to discuss how each group contributed to the American Revolution . and the importance of Thomas Paine's pamplet Common Sense and its influence on the Declaration of Independence. Fast also asserted that the American Revolution "shook all of Europe" leading to the French Revolution and other revolutionary struggles. At the conclusion of his lecture, Fast gave the audience the opportunity to askquestions. Some of his answers were based on his personal experiences and involve-ment in various political activities. The audience learned that Fast was a member of the Communist party for fifteen years and, as a result, found it difficult to live in America during this time of Great Terror, which he describes in his most recent novel The Pledge . Sophomores Prepare for Orientation '89 Suzanne Podurgiel and Chris McSherry Photo: R. N. AnnMarie Puckhaber News Editor The class of 1991, under the advisement ofJeanne DiMuzio, Judicial Officer and Director of Orientation, has already begun planning for Orientation' 89 which will welcome in the class of 1993. The first meeting con-cerning orientation was held last semester in November and the selection process for the executive council began the day students returned from Christmas vacation. Christopher McSherry and Suzanne Podurgiel have been selected out of a group of twenty people, four men and sixteen women, for the co-chair positions. McSherry is a marketing major from Crestwood, NY, and Podur-giel is a biology major from Nor-wich, CT. The six day-chair posi-tions have been filled by: William Crean, a politics major from Westfield, MA; Caroline DuBois, abiology major from Bedford, NH; Alan Couture, abiology major from Waterbury, CT; Annemarie Ran-dazzo, a business major from Bronz, NY; James Callow, a busi-ness major from Park Ridge, NJ; and Lori Mazza, a religious studies major from Levittown, NY. DiMuzio said that the selection process reflected what the students will be confronted with during orientation. All of the co-chair and day-chair candidates, 31 in total, went through the same process. The candidates were Continued on Page 2
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 13, No. 15 - February 23, 1989 |
Date | February 23 1989 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19890223 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | The FairfieldMRRORV Volume 13, No. 15 Our Second Decade Thursday, February 23, 1989 "Happy Pearl Harbor Day" Kurtzman Details Ethical Dilemmas of the Journalist Lynn Ann Casey Assistant Editor "It isn't easy to see who is telling the truth." "It is necessary forjournalists to regard everything they are told with a grain of salt." Journalists are faced with ethical dilemmas every day in their pro-fession. This was the topic of Joel Kurtzman, Business and Financial Journalist of the New York Times on February 14. In "Media and Business: The Ethical Dilemmas," the inau-gural lecture of the John Winthrop Wright Lecture Series, Kurtzman addressed the problems that come along with the journalism profes-sion. "The idea of studying busi-ness ethics is long overdue," said Kurtzman in praise of the series. , Kurtzman calls ethics "those values that enable us to a common good." Journalists are trained to be skeptics and, despite the ethical barriers and obstacles in their path, they must "find the truth." Kurt-zman has seen this in his experi-ence at theNew York Times as well as in other endeavors in writing. Dr. Keith Martin* of the School ofBusiness at Fairfield Uni-versity, introduced Kurtzman, naming the many accomplishments of the weekly columnist. A gradu-ate of the University of California at Berkeley in 1970, Kurtzman went on to get his masters at the University of Houston. He has founded a scholarly journal, worked as a consultant to Toyota, has forecasted the debt crisis in the Third World, and has lectured at many other universities, including Oxford and Georgetown. Kurt-zman is also the author of thirteen books. The columnist feels that ethics is "a code of objectivity" and he exemplified this specifi-cally with the policies ofthe Times. All journalists at the New York Times must make a pledge when they begin theirj obs to stand above temptation in return for a promise oflifetime employment. Kurtzman feels that this encourages journal-ists even more to stand by their ethical code. "Without the media, it would be a quiet world," com-mented Kurtzman. But, the es-sence of the media includes the reporting offacts to the public. The journalist has the responsibility to distinguish the facts "even if it goes against theirown ideology." Journalists must ignore their opin-ions and biases to report the facts objectively. A journalist can interview sometimes up to 30 people for one story. But, according to Kurtzman, "the chances are quite high that he (the journalist) is being manipu-lated or simply lied to." The jour-nalist must "look past the hype to ascertain the truth." Before a story is published at the New York Times, it can go through as many as seven layers of editing. The process, though, does happen quickly and "errors do get through." These layers are neces-sary to "remove our prejudice and ideology." Despite this, the layers and care taken,'with each article is subject to criticism. Kurtzman discussed public relations and the relation of such departments and companies to the newspaper media. These compa-nies can be a temptation to jounal-ists because they often offer trips, meals, and other perks to jounal-ists. But, at the Times, said Kurt-zman, "we pay our own way." Care must be taken because public rela-tions people are trained to manage the media, and many are experts at theirjob. Therefore, reporters must develop "delicate relationships with public relations agencies because these agencies can deter-mine what we know about the truth." "It is the very critical issues that make journalism an interest-ing profession." The profesison is "subject to bribes and high-pow-ered propaganda." As ajournalist, Kurtzman said he must "live by my code and make sure my sources are the right ones." Kurtzman concluded by saying that, "we must ask ourselves tough questions and it can be tiring and wrenching, but it also can be a hell of a lot of fun." Novelist Analyzes Roots of American Revolution Christine Doody Staff Writer The fourth lecture in the Revolution Lecture Series was held on Monday, February 13th, at 8 pm in the Nursing Auditorium. The guest speaker, novelist Howard Fast, spoke on the meaning of revolution in America. Howard Fast began writing in 1933 and has since written over fifty historical novels ranging in subject matter from ancient Egypt to 20th Century America. How-ever, his main focus in many nov-els has been on the American Revolution. Fast began the lecture by creating an image ofa wheel where there was something at the top and something different at the bottom. He said that for a valid revolution to occur, that which was once on the top must descend to the lower part of the wheel, while that which was once on the bottom must ro-tate upward, achieving the top position. As a result of the Glorious Revolution, Fast explained, the English throne was weakened and "it exercised it's power in North America with the conjection ofthe English mercantile community." He stated that in America there were particularly four groups, representing different industries and classes, that were ready to revolt against the conditions that prevented them from progressing. He categorized them as the indus-trial workers, the farmers, the people on the frontier, and the upper class Americans. The industrial workers in-cluded carpenters, shipbuilders, glass makers, and specifically the Rope Walkers, those who manu-factured rope. Their main objec-tion to British rule was to the vari-ous Acts that Parliament passed, most of which strongly discour-aged trade with any other nation other than Great Britain. In many cases, the colonies were permitted to produce goods, but those goods could only be sold within the colonies or to England. Fast pointed out that the industrial workers were among the very first to revolt because Britain "got in their way all the time." The second group Fast mentioned was the farmers. Amer-ica during the time of the Revolu-tion was a great agricultural soci-ety; plantations were numerous. However, most of the land was owned by the king, not the colo-nists. For the farmers, owning property meant freedom and wealth as well as a field on which to plant crops. Thirdly, Fast noted that the people on the frontier were also unhappy with land restrictions that the throne enforced. Frontier people would travel through the wilderness and settle in an area with hopes that the crown wouldn't locate them. However, the king's soldiers, allied with the Indians, usually managed to find them. Hostility between the crown and the colonies increased with the fourth group Fast discussed - the upper class Americans. This cate-gory included people such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson who were educated, well-read, and land owners. Fast used Washington as an example to illustrate how tensions were created. Fast explained how Washington sent barrels oftobacco which were produced on his plan-tation to London, along with a list of goods he needed and sometimes wanted in exchange forhis tobacco. Fast described Washington as one "who never had a dollar in his pocket," for England never gave him a cash payment for his crop. Fast continued to discuss how each group contributed to the American Revolution . and the importance of Thomas Paine's pamplet Common Sense and its influence on the Declaration of Independence. Fast also asserted that the American Revolution "shook all of Europe" leading to the French Revolution and other revolutionary struggles. At the conclusion of his lecture, Fast gave the audience the opportunity to askquestions. Some of his answers were based on his personal experiences and involve-ment in various political activities. The audience learned that Fast was a member of the Communist party for fifteen years and, as a result, found it difficult to live in America during this time of Great Terror, which he describes in his most recent novel The Pledge . Sophomores Prepare for Orientation '89 Suzanne Podurgiel and Chris McSherry Photo: R. N. AnnMarie Puckhaber News Editor The class of 1991, under the advisement ofJeanne DiMuzio, Judicial Officer and Director of Orientation, has already begun planning for Orientation' 89 which will welcome in the class of 1993. The first meeting con-cerning orientation was held last semester in November and the selection process for the executive council began the day students returned from Christmas vacation. Christopher McSherry and Suzanne Podurgiel have been selected out of a group of twenty people, four men and sixteen women, for the co-chair positions. McSherry is a marketing major from Crestwood, NY, and Podur-giel is a biology major from Nor-wich, CT. The six day-chair posi-tions have been filled by: William Crean, a politics major from Westfield, MA; Caroline DuBois, abiology major from Bedford, NH; Alan Couture, abiology major from Waterbury, CT; Annemarie Ran-dazzo, a business major from Bronz, NY; James Callow, a busi-ness major from Park Ridge, NJ; and Lori Mazza, a religious studies major from Levittown, NY. DiMuzio said that the selection process reflected what the students will be confronted with during orientation. All of the co-chair and day-chair candidates, 31 in total, went through the same process. The candidates were Continued on Page 2 |