Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
The FairfieldMIRRORy Volume 10, No. 28 Our Tenth Year Thursday, March 19, 1987 The Image of Fairfield Lady Stags Withdraw From MAAC Tournament By Chris Michailoff Staff Writer The Lady Stags, who finished their season at 18-10 overall, and in third place in the MAAC, were forced to withdraw from the MAAC championship tournament. According to Dr. Harold Menninger, the university Athletic Director, "Fairfield University had voluntarily withdrawn its women's basketball team from the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference championship tournament" The team had already played 28 basketball games this season. The NCAA allows a Division I women's basketball team to play 28 games, but the NCAA-game limit includes play in conference post-season tournaments. The playoffs are considered one game by the NCAA, regardless of how many games a team plays in the tournament. The Lady Stags played 28 regular season games this season. If they had gone to the MAAC tournament they would have committed a violation which could have resulted in sanctions against the team. A misinterpretation of the NCAA's regulation on regular season games resulted in the extra game being played. The Lady Stags had set the 1986-87 schedule last year. The Head Coach, Dianne Nolan, worked out the schedule and submitted a copy to the then Athletic Director Don Cook. The Athletic Director confirms the schedule and sends it on to the MAAC offices for approval. After it gains committee approval it is sent to the NCAA for final approval. The extra game error had slipped past everyone. Menninger, the current Athletic Director said, "No one individual is responsible for this administrative error. At this time there are many people who are responsible." Before Fairfield had played their 28th game Mark Breslin, Nolan's husband and assistant coach, told Nolan that the team had played one game more then any other MAAC team. Nolan reported this to Menninger. He in turn checked the NCAA manual and looked at the 1985-86 team schedule. In the previous season the Lady Stags had played 29 games. In effect the team was in violation of NCAA regulations in that season also. It went unreported and undetected. Menninger gave Nolan approval to play the 28th game, not aware of the regulation stating no team could play more than 27 regular season games. On Thursday MAAC commisioner Don DiJulia was reading a New Jersey paper which printed the Lady Stags final record. Realizing the discrepancy, DiJulia contacted Fairfield. Once the team had played the 28th game and realized they would be in violation of NCAA if they were to play in the tournament, they voluntarily withdrew. The university reported the mistake to the NCAA. The Lady Stags appealed to the NCAA for a possible exception. "We weren't trying to gain an advantage in this situation." Nolan said. "I felt an honest mistake had been made and they were tough consequences to pay." The NCAA refused to waive the rule for Fairfield. Nolan says that she was, "devastated" and it was the hardest thing she ever had to do in telling the team the news of the decision. "I was looking forward to playing in the MAAC tournament." said Senior Chana Wilkerson. "But it was a bad way to go out and there's no one to blame." Junior Tasia Turkalo, a second team All-MAAC selection for the past two seasons echoed Wilkerson's sentiments. "It was devasting to the team, and what made it harder was that we found out the day the men made it into the NCAA's. We all worked hard and put in alot of time." This was the Lady Stags finest season. "I'd rather lose on the court than lose by not playing at all." said Dana Pellegrino, a first team All-MAAC guard this season. "There was nothing we can do about it. The team was working hard all year and we just want the chance to prove that we can win." Just as in the men's program, the winner of the MAAC tournament earns an automatic bid to the NCAA tournament. Fairfield was seeded third, behind LaSalle and Holy Cross, two schools they had recently defeated. Manhattan won the tournament. «?&^ Meet the 1987-88 FUSA Cabinet. (L to R) Front Row—John Chiania, Bridget Mo-ran, Tina Bugaro, Karen Beedenbender, Carmine (Happy to be in FUSA) Anza-lone, Sam Faillace and Mr. Ritchie. Back Row—Tony Minnefor, Rusty Magner, Shireen Rustum, Lisa Shook, Frank Carroll, Charlene Sorvillo, Kerry Pollicino, Tina Maciag, Marianne Walsh, Terri Durso, Ken Caisse. [Photo by Andrea Whitehouse] ITS A NICE PLACE TO VISIT, BUT... Eddie Golden takes it to the hoop in the Hoosier Dome. The Stags were ousted from the first round of the NCAA tournament by Indiana 92-58 in front of 29,610 spectators. (See story page 16) (Photo by Kevin Wolfthal) Study on University Revealed By Joseph T. Draper Editor in Chief The University is in the midst of its most comprehensive self evaluation in preparation for its ten year accreditation renewal by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC). A final draft will be submitted to the Association in August. Rev. Thomas J. Savage, S.J., the assistant Vice President of Academics, began directing the self-study in January of last year. Over one hundred faculty members, administrators and students are actively studying the various aspects of the university in an attempt to present a comprehensive and accurate picture of the school to the agency. "It (the study) does not examine or assess individual programs or departments as such. We have chosen to be comprehensive rather than focus on one or two issues." Savage said "The accrediting agency has over 100 pages on procedures. There are twelve standards of evaluation. We have organinzed these into eight task forces." The following are the task forces: The Unversity. It is responsible for reviewing the school as a whole and the entire academic system of Fairfield. Organization and Governance looks at the management and govenance according to certain predetermined criteria. Programs and Instruction examines the educational programs available here. Other task forces have studied the Faculty, Student Services and Special Activities, Library and Learning Resources, Physical and Financial Resources and finally Ethical Practices, Publications and Advertising. In the first draft distributed throughout the school in late February the Self-Study highlighted the strengths and areas of concern within the univesity community. The group listed the following among the school's strengths: "Strong presidential leadership and initiative especially in the areas of advancement and planning. Continued commitment to a strong core requirement for all undergraduates in the College of Arts and Sciences, School of Business and School of Nursing." "The development of new academic programs and minors to increase the University's ability to respond to an increasingly computer-oriented and technological society, a more international perspective, a business environment in which issues of finance are of special concern, and a more complex world in which ethical choices and issues of faith, peace and justice are of increasing significance." "Exceptionally dedicated and loyal University support staff and the "continued diversification in membership on the Board of Trustees" were also seen as positive. Continued on page 2
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 10, No. 28 - March 19, 1987 |
Date | March 19 1987 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19870319 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | The FairfieldMIRRORy Volume 10, No. 28 Our Tenth Year Thursday, March 19, 1987 The Image of Fairfield Lady Stags Withdraw From MAAC Tournament By Chris Michailoff Staff Writer The Lady Stags, who finished their season at 18-10 overall, and in third place in the MAAC, were forced to withdraw from the MAAC championship tournament. According to Dr. Harold Menninger, the university Athletic Director, "Fairfield University had voluntarily withdrawn its women's basketball team from the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference championship tournament" The team had already played 28 basketball games this season. The NCAA allows a Division I women's basketball team to play 28 games, but the NCAA-game limit includes play in conference post-season tournaments. The playoffs are considered one game by the NCAA, regardless of how many games a team plays in the tournament. The Lady Stags played 28 regular season games this season. If they had gone to the MAAC tournament they would have committed a violation which could have resulted in sanctions against the team. A misinterpretation of the NCAA's regulation on regular season games resulted in the extra game being played. The Lady Stags had set the 1986-87 schedule last year. The Head Coach, Dianne Nolan, worked out the schedule and submitted a copy to the then Athletic Director Don Cook. The Athletic Director confirms the schedule and sends it on to the MAAC offices for approval. After it gains committee approval it is sent to the NCAA for final approval. The extra game error had slipped past everyone. Menninger, the current Athletic Director said, "No one individual is responsible for this administrative error. At this time there are many people who are responsible." Before Fairfield had played their 28th game Mark Breslin, Nolan's husband and assistant coach, told Nolan that the team had played one game more then any other MAAC team. Nolan reported this to Menninger. He in turn checked the NCAA manual and looked at the 1985-86 team schedule. In the previous season the Lady Stags had played 29 games. In effect the team was in violation of NCAA regulations in that season also. It went unreported and undetected. Menninger gave Nolan approval to play the 28th game, not aware of the regulation stating no team could play more than 27 regular season games. On Thursday MAAC commisioner Don DiJulia was reading a New Jersey paper which printed the Lady Stags final record. Realizing the discrepancy, DiJulia contacted Fairfield. Once the team had played the 28th game and realized they would be in violation of NCAA if they were to play in the tournament, they voluntarily withdrew. The university reported the mistake to the NCAA. The Lady Stags appealed to the NCAA for a possible exception. "We weren't trying to gain an advantage in this situation." Nolan said. "I felt an honest mistake had been made and they were tough consequences to pay." The NCAA refused to waive the rule for Fairfield. Nolan says that she was, "devastated" and it was the hardest thing she ever had to do in telling the team the news of the decision. "I was looking forward to playing in the MAAC tournament." said Senior Chana Wilkerson. "But it was a bad way to go out and there's no one to blame." Junior Tasia Turkalo, a second team All-MAAC selection for the past two seasons echoed Wilkerson's sentiments. "It was devasting to the team, and what made it harder was that we found out the day the men made it into the NCAA's. We all worked hard and put in alot of time." This was the Lady Stags finest season. "I'd rather lose on the court than lose by not playing at all." said Dana Pellegrino, a first team All-MAAC guard this season. "There was nothing we can do about it. The team was working hard all year and we just want the chance to prove that we can win." Just as in the men's program, the winner of the MAAC tournament earns an automatic bid to the NCAA tournament. Fairfield was seeded third, behind LaSalle and Holy Cross, two schools they had recently defeated. Manhattan won the tournament. «?&^ Meet the 1987-88 FUSA Cabinet. (L to R) Front Row—John Chiania, Bridget Mo-ran, Tina Bugaro, Karen Beedenbender, Carmine (Happy to be in FUSA) Anza-lone, Sam Faillace and Mr. Ritchie. Back Row—Tony Minnefor, Rusty Magner, Shireen Rustum, Lisa Shook, Frank Carroll, Charlene Sorvillo, Kerry Pollicino, Tina Maciag, Marianne Walsh, Terri Durso, Ken Caisse. [Photo by Andrea Whitehouse] ITS A NICE PLACE TO VISIT, BUT... Eddie Golden takes it to the hoop in the Hoosier Dome. The Stags were ousted from the first round of the NCAA tournament by Indiana 92-58 in front of 29,610 spectators. (See story page 16) (Photo by Kevin Wolfthal) Study on University Revealed By Joseph T. Draper Editor in Chief The University is in the midst of its most comprehensive self evaluation in preparation for its ten year accreditation renewal by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC). A final draft will be submitted to the Association in August. Rev. Thomas J. Savage, S.J., the assistant Vice President of Academics, began directing the self-study in January of last year. Over one hundred faculty members, administrators and students are actively studying the various aspects of the university in an attempt to present a comprehensive and accurate picture of the school to the agency. "It (the study) does not examine or assess individual programs or departments as such. We have chosen to be comprehensive rather than focus on one or two issues." Savage said "The accrediting agency has over 100 pages on procedures. There are twelve standards of evaluation. We have organinzed these into eight task forces." The following are the task forces: The Unversity. It is responsible for reviewing the school as a whole and the entire academic system of Fairfield. Organization and Governance looks at the management and govenance according to certain predetermined criteria. Programs and Instruction examines the educational programs available here. Other task forces have studied the Faculty, Student Services and Special Activities, Library and Learning Resources, Physical and Financial Resources and finally Ethical Practices, Publications and Advertising. In the first draft distributed throughout the school in late February the Self-Study highlighted the strengths and areas of concern within the univesity community. The group listed the following among the school's strengths: "Strong presidential leadership and initiative especially in the areas of advancement and planning. Continued commitment to a strong core requirement for all undergraduates in the College of Arts and Sciences, School of Business and School of Nursing." "The development of new academic programs and minors to increase the University's ability to respond to an increasingly computer-oriented and technological society, a more international perspective, a business environment in which issues of finance are of special concern, and a more complex world in which ethical choices and issues of faith, peace and justice are of increasing significance." "Exceptionally dedicated and loyal University support staff and the "continued diversification in membership on the Board of Trustees" were also seen as positive. Continued on page 2 |