Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
TheMirror FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY Volume 26, Number 7 www.fairfieldmirror.com Thursday, November 2,2000 Faculty Homecomingweekend wants say * in pay ByDonovan Wiedmann CONTElffilJriNGWRITER Many Fairneld University faculty members are upset with a proposal by the school administration to do away with traditional salarynegotiationswith the university professors. The dispute arose whenAcademic Vice President Orin Grossmanproposed a change in the process ofsalary nego-tiation in a letter sent to the general fac-ulty. Traditionally, afaculty salarycom-mitteebargainedwithanadministrative committee over salary, but this only "took on the appearance ofnegotiation" according to Grossman's letter. "There are no negotiations in the normal sense ofunion bargaining," he said, butratherdiscussions, since faculty are guaranteedto be paid at the 95thper-centile in salary and benefits ofcompa-rable schools. Grossman suggested the salarycom-mittee talk directly to the budget com-mittee. "Itwould be better ifthe faculty salary committee did not meet with a separate adrninistrative committee, but instead maderecommendations directly to the to the budget committee, which has become the appropriate group of ackninistrative officers regaidingfaculty salaries and benefits," he wrote in the Sept. 22 memo. The faculty reaction was swift. "There are a fair number offacultywho found the tone ofthis memo threaten-ing," professor George Langofthe math departmentsaid Lang said that a strike was out of the question because itviolated contrac-tual agreementswiththe university. In 1992, informational picketing and protests occurred at the university over a faculty disagreementwith the admin-istration. The resultwas the forming of the FacultyWelfare Committee,which became a chapter oftheAmericanAsso-ciation ofUniversity Professors. "There was never a strike or talk of a strike, and there won't be one now," saidLang. KathyNantz, secretary ofthe general faculty said, "The current sys-temshouldremain thewayit is until the faculty, alongwith the aclministration, can determine anewwaythatwillwork better. There can't be one person decid- Fairjield's annualhomecomingtookplace thispastweekend. Many alumni witnessedthe Stags' 38-14 victory over Georgetown. Some went to see Colin Quinn atAlumniHall ForcoverageofthefootbaUgame, seep. 20. Forcoverage ofQuinn'sperformance, seep. 7. ing that there is a new waythings will be done." Donald Greenberg, professor of politics, felt the letter implied that the salary committee was unnecessary. It was an "attack on faculty governance," he said, adding, "Vice President Grossman is attacking a fundamental principle ofwhat constitutes workers' rights." Although not explicitly stated in Grossman's memo,manyfacultymem-bers feel he intends to dissolve the fac-ultysalary committee,whichhas existed for over 30 years, and leave the salary issueup to the budget committee, which consists ofthevice presidents, three fac-ultymembers, astudentandastaff mem-ber. Greenberg questioned Grossman's view ofthe budget committee. "They don't really represent faculty interest," he said. "Faculty representation on the budget committee is not sufficientinany stretch ofthe imagination." Grossman said "The present system is deeply flawed."With the university's commitment to the 95th percentile in salaries andappropriate discussionwith the budget committee and salary com-mittee, he said, "compensation should remain competitive." Thejournal "Academe," published by theAmericanAssociation ofUniversity Professors, ranked Fairfield in the 95th percentile for compensationamongcat See"Faculty"onp.4 With election day less than one week away, The Mirror continues witha variety ofcoverage. Look for the following stories inside this week's MiiTor: NEWS: •k Profiles ofthe democratic and republican candidates for thel34th district-See p. 5 COMMENTARY: C< Student urges peers to get out and vote-See p. 10 iV Debates criticized for exclusion ofthird parties-See p. 10 iSr Bush's environmental policy criticized-See p. 11 )< Two students debate abortion-See p. 11 )< Campus Forum: IfI were president for a day...-See p. 12 k HE SAID, SHE SAID:Awoman president?~See p. 13 ARTS &ENTERTAINMENT: JV Late night with the candidates-See p. 14 HiVR^^H Alumni See page L1 «j *m•. i 11■■Kill1Kf udents' opinion: of the Mirror See page
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 26, No. 07 - November 02, 2000 |
Date | November 02 2000 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR20001102 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | TheMirror FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY Volume 26, Number 7 www.fairfieldmirror.com Thursday, November 2,2000 Faculty Homecomingweekend wants say * in pay ByDonovan Wiedmann CONTElffilJriNGWRITER Many Fairneld University faculty members are upset with a proposal by the school administration to do away with traditional salarynegotiationswith the university professors. The dispute arose whenAcademic Vice President Orin Grossmanproposed a change in the process ofsalary nego-tiation in a letter sent to the general fac-ulty. Traditionally, afaculty salarycom-mitteebargainedwithanadministrative committee over salary, but this only "took on the appearance ofnegotiation" according to Grossman's letter. "There are no negotiations in the normal sense ofunion bargaining," he said, butratherdiscussions, since faculty are guaranteedto be paid at the 95thper-centile in salary and benefits ofcompa-rable schools. Grossman suggested the salarycom-mittee talk directly to the budget com-mittee. "Itwould be better ifthe faculty salary committee did not meet with a separate adrninistrative committee, but instead maderecommendations directly to the to the budget committee, which has become the appropriate group of ackninistrative officers regaidingfaculty salaries and benefits," he wrote in the Sept. 22 memo. The faculty reaction was swift. "There are a fair number offacultywho found the tone ofthis memo threaten-ing," professor George Langofthe math departmentsaid Lang said that a strike was out of the question because itviolated contrac-tual agreementswiththe university. In 1992, informational picketing and protests occurred at the university over a faculty disagreementwith the admin-istration. The resultwas the forming of the FacultyWelfare Committee,which became a chapter oftheAmericanAsso-ciation ofUniversity Professors. "There was never a strike or talk of a strike, and there won't be one now," saidLang. KathyNantz, secretary ofthe general faculty said, "The current sys-temshouldremain thewayit is until the faculty, alongwith the aclministration, can determine anewwaythatwillwork better. There can't be one person decid- Fairjield's annualhomecomingtookplace thispastweekend. Many alumni witnessedthe Stags' 38-14 victory over Georgetown. Some went to see Colin Quinn atAlumniHall ForcoverageofthefootbaUgame, seep. 20. Forcoverage ofQuinn'sperformance, seep. 7. ing that there is a new waythings will be done." Donald Greenberg, professor of politics, felt the letter implied that the salary committee was unnecessary. It was an "attack on faculty governance," he said, adding, "Vice President Grossman is attacking a fundamental principle ofwhat constitutes workers' rights." Although not explicitly stated in Grossman's memo,manyfacultymem-bers feel he intends to dissolve the fac-ultysalary committee,whichhas existed for over 30 years, and leave the salary issueup to the budget committee, which consists ofthevice presidents, three fac-ultymembers, astudentandastaff mem-ber. Greenberg questioned Grossman's view ofthe budget committee. "They don't really represent faculty interest," he said. "Faculty representation on the budget committee is not sufficientinany stretch ofthe imagination." Grossman said "The present system is deeply flawed."With the university's commitment to the 95th percentile in salaries andappropriate discussionwith the budget committee and salary com-mittee, he said, "compensation should remain competitive." Thejournal "Academe," published by theAmericanAssociation ofUniversity Professors, ranked Fairfield in the 95th percentile for compensationamongcat See"Faculty"onp.4 With election day less than one week away, The Mirror continues witha variety ofcoverage. Look for the following stories inside this week's MiiTor: NEWS: •k Profiles ofthe democratic and republican candidates for thel34th district-See p. 5 COMMENTARY: C< Student urges peers to get out and vote-See p. 10 iV Debates criticized for exclusion ofthird parties-See p. 10 iSr Bush's environmental policy criticized-See p. 11 )< Two students debate abortion-See p. 11 )< Campus Forum: IfI were president for a day...-See p. 12 k HE SAID, SHE SAID:Awoman president?~See p. 13 ARTS &ENTERTAINMENT: JV Late night with the candidates-See p. 14 HiVR^^H Alumni See page L1 «j *m•. i 11■■Kill1Kf udents' opinion: of the Mirror See page |