Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
TheMirror
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY
Volume 26,Number6 www.fairfieldmirror.com Thursday, October 26,2000
By FrankWashkuch
ASSISTANTNEWSEDITOR
A42-year old resident ofthe
University Park development proved
early Fridaymorningthat students can
have problems with town residents too
whenhetyrannicaUyraidedaimiversity
townhouse and left over $500 ofdam-age
in his wake.
Greg Stan, a resident of
Mailands Road, was allegedly taking
pictures ofthe residents oftownhouse
82 and their friends on theirbackporch
shortly after4am.
Stanthenapproachedthegroup
andbegantakingclose-up pictures of the
students. According to eyewitnesses,
Stan thenbecameviolent, kickingin the
backdoor of the townhouse, enteringthe
See p. 4 for more
coverage ofthe
townhouses
PhotttPaulPennelli
Townhouse 82*s stereodestroyedbyUniversityParkneighbor.
FBRA. takes steps towards rerrtoTjingstudentsfromFairfieldBeach
ByBrianHuben
NEWSEDITOR
Only a month after the passing ofa
noise ordinance they largely supported,
the Fairfield Beach RoadAssociation
(FBRA) is on the attack again.
A letter was sent last week by the
FBRAto the Rev. Aloysius P. Kelley,
S.J., university president, as well as
members ofthe administration and lo-cal
news media, callingfor stricter sanc-tions
on studentbeach residents by the
university
Some say this is one more step by
members ofthe FBRAtowards what
many believe is their ultimate goal-to
eliminate students living at Fairfield
Beach
'This letter clearly illustrates the at-titude
thatthe officers of the FBRAhave:
one, that they do not like students; and
two, that they want us out of'their'
neighborhood," Kevin Hayes, Fairfield
University StudentAssociation presi-dent,
said.
The letter, obtained by The Mirror,
cited measures takenbythe administra:
tion ofLoyola College in Baltimore,
Md., to deal with students who live in
an off-campus neighborhood that the
FBRAclaims is"almostidenticaltoLan-ternPoinf.
DougWhiting,
associate vice
president for pub-lic
relations, how-ever,
differs with
that opinion. "It
should be under-stood
that the
Loyola model is
being applied to a
very different situ-ation,"
he said.
Whiting says
thatthe situation at
Loyola is different
from Fairfield's in a
myriad of ways.
The Loyola sanc-tions
theFBRAare
referringto applyto
students living in
Gallagher Park, an
area adjacent to the
school. Fairfield
student beach resi-dents
live approxi-matelytwo
andhalf
miles from campus.
Also, Gallagher Park is only occupied
by 152 Loyola students, amuchsmaller
amountthan Fairfield students at Fair-field
Beach, and is located in a com-pletelyresidential
area
See"FBRA"onp.4
r
This Week KlllOWtVIl I'tVYU'W
See page 8
Object Description
| Title | Mirror - Vol. 26, No. 06 - October 26, 2000 |
| Date | October 26 2000 |
| Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
| Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
| Type of Document | Newspaper |
| Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
| Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
| Publisher | Fairfield University |
| Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
| Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
| Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
| Identifier | MIR20001026 |
Description
| Title | Page 1 |
| SearchData | TheMirror FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY Volume 26,Number6 www.fairfieldmirror.com Thursday, October 26,2000 By FrankWashkuch ASSISTANTNEWSEDITOR A42-year old resident ofthe University Park development proved early Fridaymorningthat students can have problems with town residents too whenhetyrannicaUyraidedaimiversity townhouse and left over $500 ofdam-age in his wake. Greg Stan, a resident of Mailands Road, was allegedly taking pictures ofthe residents oftownhouse 82 and their friends on theirbackporch shortly after4am. Stanthenapproachedthegroup andbegantakingclose-up pictures of the students. According to eyewitnesses, Stan thenbecameviolent, kickingin the backdoor of the townhouse, enteringthe See p. 4 for more coverage ofthe townhouses PhotttPaulPennelli Townhouse 82*s stereodestroyedbyUniversityParkneighbor. FBRA. takes steps towards rerrtoTjingstudentsfromFairfieldBeach ByBrianHuben NEWSEDITOR Only a month after the passing ofa noise ordinance they largely supported, the Fairfield Beach RoadAssociation (FBRA) is on the attack again. A letter was sent last week by the FBRAto the Rev. Aloysius P. Kelley, S.J., university president, as well as members ofthe administration and lo-cal news media, callingfor stricter sanc-tions on studentbeach residents by the university Some say this is one more step by members ofthe FBRAtowards what many believe is their ultimate goal-to eliminate students living at Fairfield Beach 'This letter clearly illustrates the at-titude thatthe officers of the FBRAhave: one, that they do not like students; and two, that they want us out of'their' neighborhood," Kevin Hayes, Fairfield University StudentAssociation presi-dent, said. The letter, obtained by The Mirror, cited measures takenbythe administra: tion ofLoyola College in Baltimore, Md., to deal with students who live in an off-campus neighborhood that the FBRAclaims is"almostidenticaltoLan-ternPoinf. DougWhiting, associate vice president for pub-lic relations, how-ever, differs with that opinion. "It should be under-stood that the Loyola model is being applied to a very different situ-ation," he said. Whiting says thatthe situation at Loyola is different from Fairfield's in a myriad of ways. The Loyola sanc-tions theFBRAare referringto applyto students living in Gallagher Park, an area adjacent to the school. Fairfield student beach resi-dents live approxi-matelytwo andhalf miles from campus. Also, Gallagher Park is only occupied by 152 Loyola students, amuchsmaller amountthan Fairfield students at Fair-field Beach, and is located in a com-pletelyresidential area See"FBRA"onp.4 r This Week KlllOWtVIl I'tVYU'W See page 8 |