Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
The FairfieldMRRORV Volume 17, No. 8 Thursday, November 12, 1992 All the News That's Print to Fit Student Art Censored Debra De Shong News Editor The next time senior Mike Anderer is bored at three o'clock in the morning, he'll think twice about how he passes the time. Last time at that hour, he and his housemates decided to make a po-litical statement and artistic draw-ing that was deemed obscene and confiscated by the office of Resi-dence Life. Anderer made a black and white banner that read "Read my lips, no Bush in '92," and had three vertical lines and a diagonal line that security called, "graphic de-piction of female genitalia." The poster was hung in the window of townhouse 82 in the early hours of October 13 and by 9 am, security reported the banner to Residence Life who confiscated it and subse-quently charged Anderer with vio-lating the obscenity code in the student handbook. Anderer said, "people who think that the banner is what they said it was, obviously never saw female genitalia." He feels that people thought it was much worse than it is. The idea for the artistic representation came from a T-shirt design advertised in the Village Voice. "No way was it my creation," said Anderer. At first, Anderer said he was under the impression that it was a violation of his rights. How-ever, he has learned that the first and fourteenth amendment defend citizens against the government but not private institutions. In other words, private institutions like uni-versities are allowed to set their own system of standards. The faculty advisor in this case, Dr. Don Greenberg of the politics department feels that this is an important first amend-ment and freedom of expression issue. However, in this case, Fairfield failed to set a specific set of standards and Anderer was found innocent. When Anderer was brought before the studentjudicial board, he said "some people had it set in their minds that it was ob-scene," but they failed to bring down a guilty verdict because the obscenity code in the student hand-book was too vague. The handbook states, "ob-scene expression, either oral or visual, on University property or University sponsored events is pro-hibited." In relation to this defini-tion, the banner could not bejudged obscene. Anderer says he does not consider the poster to be graphic or harmful, but is "willing to say it is tasteless." After the verdict of not guilty was handed down from stu-dent court, Fr. Lawrence O'Neil, the Dean of Students, forbade Anderer to rehang the poster de-spite the fact that the court ruled that it was not obscene. He claimed that it is not appropriate in this Jesuit community. He also threat-ened that if it was rehung, Anderer would be charged with another, more concrete offense. Anderer chose not to hang up the poster again. "It made me mad. I can understand the university's view, but I think it was an abusive form of control," said Anderer. "I think student court should have more of a say in disciplinary matters, but I have no idea why people found it so offensive." One student said, "I think it's offensive," but the majority of the reactions was like that of an-other student: "This is so dumb, I don't even get it." Junior Dana Felmlee said, "It's okay to put it on a t-shirt and in political cartoons, but you can't put it in your bedroom. What does the university think it's protecting us from?" As a result of this inci-dent, the university plans to re-write the code on obscenity in the handbook to make the definition more specific for future reference. Stag-Her Controversy Refuses to Die Carrie Brown Staff Writer A battle is still going on around campus in regard to the renaming of the Stag-Her Inn. Lines have been drawn and the battle between the politically cor-rect and traditionalists rages on. The FUSA Senate has initiated a petition to keep the name of the Stag-Her Inn. In efforts to curtail the agreement, a calling for sugges-tions of new names, by the Uni-versity Council, is still going on. On October 27, the FUSA Senate discussed the situation and several options were announced for bringing about a solution to the controversy. They, in turn, felt tha tthe majority of the people didn't take offense to the original name. Thus, an Ad-Hoc Com-mittee was established by the Sen-ate. This committee requested stu-dent signatures to a petition that asked that the name of the pub remain the Stag Her Inn. The petition was located in the campus center lobby for two days but only 170 names were collected. The FUSA Senate meet-ing on November 3 discussed, in The center of controversy, the Stag Her Inn. greater detail, the specific argu-ments for the change of the name of the pub, and those for the name to remain as is. Some felt that the name ssignified the historical acceptance of women in to the university. The pub was originally called the Stag, but when women were admitted in 1971, the Her was tagged on. Still others pointed out that changing the name and the sign won't stop people from calling it the Stag Her Inn. Senators have decided to make copies of the petition so that it enables them to collect signa-tures from students in their resi-dence halls as well as from faculty members. A Senatorial board mem-ber pointed out the necessity of getting as many women as pos-sible to sign the petition because that is one of the groups the Univeristy Council is claiming that the name offends. The Senate is looking for as many signatures as possible to aid them in the debate to keep the name of the pub the Stag-Her Inn. This will also be the topic of the University Council meeting and the FUSA Senate meeting on Tuesday, November 10. Look in The Mirror for future updates. Students TurnedAway at the Polls Ann Heckenberger Contributing Writer and Debra De Shong News Editor Many Fairfield students trudged across campus, in the rain, to exercise their constitu-tional right to vote last Tuesday. It marked the first year the stu-dents, as a group, made an effort to register in the town ofFairfield. Upon arrival in the Oak Room however, numerous students were informed by poll volunteers that, they were not registered to vote. There were three voter reg-istration drives in the past year and there seemed to be some prob-lem or confusion surrounding ev-, ery one. The first one was held last April as a class project for pro-fessor Sally Ann Ryan. Four stu-dents organized this project and registered 80 students, however, those registration'cards were de-clared invalid by the Registrar of Voters in the town of Fairfield due to a lack of proper notariza-tion. The Fairfield Registrar sent the invalid cards back to the no-tary (person who legally vali-dated the cards), and that person sent the cards back to one of the students in charge of the project. That student did nothing with the cards until three days before the election which was too late to remedy the problem. During the June Orienta-tion program, FUSA registered 46 students but these cards were again found invalid by the town of Fairfield. FUSA immediately took three steps; they contacted all Freshman Facilitators and asked them to tell their groups to reregister, they contacted all Resi-dent Advisors and asked them to inform their floors to reregister, and FUSA President Steve Shan-non spoke at the President's Ad-dress to the freshman class in September and reiterated the need to reregister. For the remainder of the student body who had reg-istered at the end of the previous school year, green pamphlets, explaining the registration pro-cess and the problems that had been encountered, were placed in mailboxes. A statement was written in bold print which read, "NOTE: If you filled out a reg-istration card last semester, you will have to reregister!" This fall FUSA again reg- (continued to p.3) r Grad Fair orovides info to puzzled students page 2 Shuttle driver makes public trans-portation a joy ride page 7 The latest victims of beach robbery emerge page 14 Movie Preview Forecasts Hot Winter page 17 Men' s Soccer falls in finals page 20 Before you register for classes, be sure to check out the FUSA Faculty Evaluations, pp. 4-6
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 17, No. 08 - November 12, 1992 |
Date | November 12 1992 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19921112 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | The FairfieldMRRORV Volume 17, No. 8 Thursday, November 12, 1992 All the News That's Print to Fit Student Art Censored Debra De Shong News Editor The next time senior Mike Anderer is bored at three o'clock in the morning, he'll think twice about how he passes the time. Last time at that hour, he and his housemates decided to make a po-litical statement and artistic draw-ing that was deemed obscene and confiscated by the office of Resi-dence Life. Anderer made a black and white banner that read "Read my lips, no Bush in '92," and had three vertical lines and a diagonal line that security called, "graphic de-piction of female genitalia." The poster was hung in the window of townhouse 82 in the early hours of October 13 and by 9 am, security reported the banner to Residence Life who confiscated it and subse-quently charged Anderer with vio-lating the obscenity code in the student handbook. Anderer said, "people who think that the banner is what they said it was, obviously never saw female genitalia." He feels that people thought it was much worse than it is. The idea for the artistic representation came from a T-shirt design advertised in the Village Voice. "No way was it my creation," said Anderer. At first, Anderer said he was under the impression that it was a violation of his rights. How-ever, he has learned that the first and fourteenth amendment defend citizens against the government but not private institutions. In other words, private institutions like uni-versities are allowed to set their own system of standards. The faculty advisor in this case, Dr. Don Greenberg of the politics department feels that this is an important first amend-ment and freedom of expression issue. However, in this case, Fairfield failed to set a specific set of standards and Anderer was found innocent. When Anderer was brought before the studentjudicial board, he said "some people had it set in their minds that it was ob-scene," but they failed to bring down a guilty verdict because the obscenity code in the student hand-book was too vague. The handbook states, "ob-scene expression, either oral or visual, on University property or University sponsored events is pro-hibited." In relation to this defini-tion, the banner could not bejudged obscene. Anderer says he does not consider the poster to be graphic or harmful, but is "willing to say it is tasteless." After the verdict of not guilty was handed down from stu-dent court, Fr. Lawrence O'Neil, the Dean of Students, forbade Anderer to rehang the poster de-spite the fact that the court ruled that it was not obscene. He claimed that it is not appropriate in this Jesuit community. He also threat-ened that if it was rehung, Anderer would be charged with another, more concrete offense. Anderer chose not to hang up the poster again. "It made me mad. I can understand the university's view, but I think it was an abusive form of control," said Anderer. "I think student court should have more of a say in disciplinary matters, but I have no idea why people found it so offensive." One student said, "I think it's offensive," but the majority of the reactions was like that of an-other student: "This is so dumb, I don't even get it." Junior Dana Felmlee said, "It's okay to put it on a t-shirt and in political cartoons, but you can't put it in your bedroom. What does the university think it's protecting us from?" As a result of this inci-dent, the university plans to re-write the code on obscenity in the handbook to make the definition more specific for future reference. Stag-Her Controversy Refuses to Die Carrie Brown Staff Writer A battle is still going on around campus in regard to the renaming of the Stag-Her Inn. Lines have been drawn and the battle between the politically cor-rect and traditionalists rages on. The FUSA Senate has initiated a petition to keep the name of the Stag-Her Inn. In efforts to curtail the agreement, a calling for sugges-tions of new names, by the Uni-versity Council, is still going on. On October 27, the FUSA Senate discussed the situation and several options were announced for bringing about a solution to the controversy. They, in turn, felt tha tthe majority of the people didn't take offense to the original name. Thus, an Ad-Hoc Com-mittee was established by the Sen-ate. This committee requested stu-dent signatures to a petition that asked that the name of the pub remain the Stag Her Inn. The petition was located in the campus center lobby for two days but only 170 names were collected. The FUSA Senate meet-ing on November 3 discussed, in The center of controversy, the Stag Her Inn. greater detail, the specific argu-ments for the change of the name of the pub, and those for the name to remain as is. Some felt that the name ssignified the historical acceptance of women in to the university. The pub was originally called the Stag, but when women were admitted in 1971, the Her was tagged on. Still others pointed out that changing the name and the sign won't stop people from calling it the Stag Her Inn. Senators have decided to make copies of the petition so that it enables them to collect signa-tures from students in their resi-dence halls as well as from faculty members. A Senatorial board mem-ber pointed out the necessity of getting as many women as pos-sible to sign the petition because that is one of the groups the Univeristy Council is claiming that the name offends. The Senate is looking for as many signatures as possible to aid them in the debate to keep the name of the pub the Stag-Her Inn. This will also be the topic of the University Council meeting and the FUSA Senate meeting on Tuesday, November 10. Look in The Mirror for future updates. Students TurnedAway at the Polls Ann Heckenberger Contributing Writer and Debra De Shong News Editor Many Fairfield students trudged across campus, in the rain, to exercise their constitu-tional right to vote last Tuesday. It marked the first year the stu-dents, as a group, made an effort to register in the town ofFairfield. Upon arrival in the Oak Room however, numerous students were informed by poll volunteers that, they were not registered to vote. There were three voter reg-istration drives in the past year and there seemed to be some prob-lem or confusion surrounding ev-, ery one. The first one was held last April as a class project for pro-fessor Sally Ann Ryan. Four stu-dents organized this project and registered 80 students, however, those registration'cards were de-clared invalid by the Registrar of Voters in the town of Fairfield due to a lack of proper notariza-tion. The Fairfield Registrar sent the invalid cards back to the no-tary (person who legally vali-dated the cards), and that person sent the cards back to one of the students in charge of the project. That student did nothing with the cards until three days before the election which was too late to remedy the problem. During the June Orienta-tion program, FUSA registered 46 students but these cards were again found invalid by the town of Fairfield. FUSA immediately took three steps; they contacted all Freshman Facilitators and asked them to tell their groups to reregister, they contacted all Resi-dent Advisors and asked them to inform their floors to reregister, and FUSA President Steve Shan-non spoke at the President's Ad-dress to the freshman class in September and reiterated the need to reregister. For the remainder of the student body who had reg-istered at the end of the previous school year, green pamphlets, explaining the registration pro-cess and the problems that had been encountered, were placed in mailboxes. A statement was written in bold print which read, "NOTE: If you filled out a reg-istration card last semester, you will have to reregister!" This fall FUSA again reg- (continued to p.3) r Grad Fair orovides info to puzzled students page 2 Shuttle driver makes public trans-portation a joy ride page 7 The latest victims of beach robbery emerge page 14 Movie Preview Forecasts Hot Winter page 17 Men' s Soccer falls in finals page 20 Before you register for classes, be sure to check out the FUSA Faculty Evaluations, pp. 4-6 |