Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Features A Poser's guide 6 Commentary Computer labs unreliable 9 A&E Star Trek's Second Generation 10 TheMIRRORv Fairfield Volume 12, No. 7 Our Second Decade Thursday, October 22, 1987 The Image of Fairfield University undergoes accreditation process By Greg Curley Staff Writer Fairfield University experienced an evaluation by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) over four days this week, from Sunday, October 18th through Wednesday, October 21st. The evaluation is the main part of the process through which the University obtains its accreditation. The NEASC is a non-profit, member organization to which Fairfield has belonged since shortly after the University was established. Schools in the NEASC must receive an evaluation team, comprised of faculty and staff from other NEASC institutions, every ten years. The team submits a report to the association, which is voted on, determining whether or not the institution deserves accreditation. "Accreditation is crucial to any University," stated Fr. Savage, the Assistant Academic Vice President. It is assurance that qaulity education is offered. Without it, numerous problems would arise, such as a difficulty for the University to obtain grants. The visiting evaluation committee consisted of 8 members, selected on their ability to inquire about various dimensions of the University. In addition, the State of Connecticut Department of Higher Education sent an evaluator to monitor the school. Fairfield is chartered by the state, and the state must assure the school's worthiness of this charter. Fairfield University spent over a year in preparation for this visit, composing a comprehensive self-study. A ten person steering committee, comprised of various university officials and chaired by Fr. Thomas J. Savage, S.J., was created. The committee obtained detailed reports, composed by task forces covering various dimensions of the University. The staff of each task force consisted of faculty and some students, all volunteers. Each answered questions outlined in the Accreditation Handbook, distributed by the NEASC. The staffs then met to discuss and debate their responses. After these meetings a first draft of the handbook was produced. The University community then had an opportunity to critique this book before Fr. Savage compiled the final draft this summer. Fr. Savage compared the evaluation process to the taking of a test, claiming, "the best part is the year in preparation for the team to come." He said that compiling the self-study is like studying, "which is what you leam from." He summed up, "You gain the most from preparation." Fr. William Carr, S.J., a member of the steering committee, noted the importance and the benefit the University received from compiling the self-study. He claimed the study promoted, "internal communication among Fairifeld students, faculty, and administration about what they thought of the school." Fr. Carr further commented that he was impressed with the study mainly because, "It showed that Fairfield was willing to admit that we will try to remedy the situation." The self-study and the evaluation provide excellent opportunity for the University to improve and strengthen itself. Fr. Savage claimed that evaluators who provide comments and suggestios "from a colleague's point of view" are most beneficial. The self-study documents and examines issues which merit critical attention. The University can then gather these materials and build upon them. Dorm damage stats revealed By Robert H. Johansen Staff Writer Each year, students create a great amount of damage in the dormitories and townhouses. According to Student Services, last year Fairfield students created more than $105,385 worth of damage by accidents and vandalism. This money must be paid by parents with the tuition bill, at the end of the year. Last year's amount was down from the '85/'86 year's figure of $102,869, and the 'S4f85 year figure of $99,159. Students who share dorm rooms or townhouses must share the bill for damage done to their rooms unless individual responsibility is taken. In the dormitories, students share the bill for their corridors and wings. According to Mr. Rossi, Director of Housing, "What that includes are things that are student damaged and also anything that would be billed to the students which would not necessarily be intentional, but accidental." At the end of the year, room checks are made. Students are encouraged to be present for this in order to detect errors. During these room checks, most of the dorm damage is discovered. This damage includes such things as broken chairs and missing smoke alarms. Mr. Rossi said that "the bulk of the damages are going to come from student rooms" and would include "things that are missing, and things that are broken and are not reported earlier in the year." Not all damage done to the dorms and townhouses can be pinpointed. This debt for the damage must then be paid with the tuition by parents. It is a separate item that is included on both the fall and spring bills. Mr. Richard Rossi receives the work orders to repair the damage done to the dorms and townhouses. He receives as many as thirty work orders each day. The maintenance department and the Housing department determine what is considered student damage. Mr. Rossi is the final arbitrator of that, and "gets the See Damage, p. 2 Father Joseph van Beeck, S.J., speaks in the Oakroom. (photo by Ronzoni) Van Beek discusses Christian Worship By Ann Marie Puckhaber Staff Writer "The Christian Church is decisively recognized by its worship," stated Reverend Franz Josef van Beeck, S.J., in his lecture "Risky Worship in a Pagan World: Christian Worship in Pliny's, Letter." On Wednesday, October 14, Father van Beeck, the John Cardinal Cody Professor of Sacred Theology at Loyola University, gave a lecture in the Campus Center Oak Room as part of the Bellarmine Lecture Series by Distinguished Jesuit Scholars. The welcome and introduction were given by Dr. Robert Stepsis, Academic Vice President. Pliny was a Roman official who wrote to the emperor, Trajan, for instructions on how to deal with the Christians. The letter was written in 112 A.-D. Father van Beeck described the letter as a "vivid picture (of Christianity) seen through the eyes of an outsider." He said that the Christians were an urgent problem to the Romans because Christianity seemed to" be "contagious." Father van Beeck's translation of Pliny's letter and Trajan's reply were distributed and read at the lecture. Father van Beeck said that the focal issue in Pliny's letter was "the worship of Christians." Pliny knew that on a fixed day the Christians gathered for a community worship and a common meal. "Liturgical worship is the heart of the the Church," said Father van Beeck. Although the Romans recognized that the Christian service was harmless, Father van Beeck said that they considered Christianity to be a "corrupt and extravagant foreign religion." Whether or not the worship service described in Pliny's letter was the Eucharist can not be determined. However, Father van Beeck said that "there are no compelling reasons to assume that it was not the Eucharist." Many of the Christians were executed by Pliny. Father van Beeck explained that they were punished by death because "the impenitent particularity and the exclusiveness of Christian worship were unacceptable." The Romans were intolerant of the Christians and the Christians refused to be like other religions. Father van Beeck said that the attraction to Christianity was "virtuous living, not notoriety." New Trustees elected By Lynn Ann Casey Staff Writer On Friday, October 9th, the Board of Trustees of Fairfield University elected seven new members at the first half of their four meetings this year. According to Fr. Higgins, S.J., the Assistant to the President, "The new board members represent the diversity of the current board." The board consists of nine Jesuits, four parents of current students, ten alumni, executives, and is comprised of both men and women. All together, there are 36 active Trustees and 7 Trustees Emeriti. Represented are a variety of states including 15 from Fairfield, 10 from New York, and four from Massachusetts. Two new Jesuits were elected. Fr. Richard Curry, S.J., a Jesuit from Philadelphia, is the Founder and Artistic Director of the National Theatre Workshop of the Handicapped in New York City. Joseph Fahey, S.J. is Vice President of Boston College. He had previously served on the board from 1972- 1981. ■— - Two parents of present students were also included on the Board. James Daly, whose daughter Julie is a freshman, is an attorney in New York City, and Jeremy Jacobsis, Chairman and CEO of Delaware North Companies, Inc., whose daughter Katie is a junior. Dennis Dammerman, Senior Vice President for General Electric in Fairifeld, and another new member, has a son who has recently graduated from Fairfield Prep. Also elected were an alumnus of the Class of '67, and a General Partner for Burr, Egan, Delage & Co. in Boston, arid a former resident and community volunteer in Fairfield County now residing in Arlington VA. The Board of Trustees is responsible for making the major policy decisions affecting the course of the University. The board does such things as setting guidelines for future policies, setting goals for building aid resources, recruiting and retaining Jesuits, and faculty resource. They have the final authority on the financial stability of the university. See Board, p. 3
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 12, No. 07 - October 22, 1987 |
Date | October 22 1987 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19871022 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | Features A Poser's guide 6 Commentary Computer labs unreliable 9 A&E Star Trek's Second Generation 10 TheMIRRORv Fairfield Volume 12, No. 7 Our Second Decade Thursday, October 22, 1987 The Image of Fairfield University undergoes accreditation process By Greg Curley Staff Writer Fairfield University experienced an evaluation by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) over four days this week, from Sunday, October 18th through Wednesday, October 21st. The evaluation is the main part of the process through which the University obtains its accreditation. The NEASC is a non-profit, member organization to which Fairfield has belonged since shortly after the University was established. Schools in the NEASC must receive an evaluation team, comprised of faculty and staff from other NEASC institutions, every ten years. The team submits a report to the association, which is voted on, determining whether or not the institution deserves accreditation. "Accreditation is crucial to any University," stated Fr. Savage, the Assistant Academic Vice President. It is assurance that qaulity education is offered. Without it, numerous problems would arise, such as a difficulty for the University to obtain grants. The visiting evaluation committee consisted of 8 members, selected on their ability to inquire about various dimensions of the University. In addition, the State of Connecticut Department of Higher Education sent an evaluator to monitor the school. Fairfield is chartered by the state, and the state must assure the school's worthiness of this charter. Fairfield University spent over a year in preparation for this visit, composing a comprehensive self-study. A ten person steering committee, comprised of various university officials and chaired by Fr. Thomas J. Savage, S.J., was created. The committee obtained detailed reports, composed by task forces covering various dimensions of the University. The staff of each task force consisted of faculty and some students, all volunteers. Each answered questions outlined in the Accreditation Handbook, distributed by the NEASC. The staffs then met to discuss and debate their responses. After these meetings a first draft of the handbook was produced. The University community then had an opportunity to critique this book before Fr. Savage compiled the final draft this summer. Fr. Savage compared the evaluation process to the taking of a test, claiming, "the best part is the year in preparation for the team to come." He said that compiling the self-study is like studying, "which is what you leam from." He summed up, "You gain the most from preparation." Fr. William Carr, S.J., a member of the steering committee, noted the importance and the benefit the University received from compiling the self-study. He claimed the study promoted, "internal communication among Fairifeld students, faculty, and administration about what they thought of the school." Fr. Carr further commented that he was impressed with the study mainly because, "It showed that Fairfield was willing to admit that we will try to remedy the situation." The self-study and the evaluation provide excellent opportunity for the University to improve and strengthen itself. Fr. Savage claimed that evaluators who provide comments and suggestios "from a colleague's point of view" are most beneficial. The self-study documents and examines issues which merit critical attention. The University can then gather these materials and build upon them. Dorm damage stats revealed By Robert H. Johansen Staff Writer Each year, students create a great amount of damage in the dormitories and townhouses. According to Student Services, last year Fairfield students created more than $105,385 worth of damage by accidents and vandalism. This money must be paid by parents with the tuition bill, at the end of the year. Last year's amount was down from the '85/'86 year's figure of $102,869, and the 'S4f85 year figure of $99,159. Students who share dorm rooms or townhouses must share the bill for damage done to their rooms unless individual responsibility is taken. In the dormitories, students share the bill for their corridors and wings. According to Mr. Rossi, Director of Housing, "What that includes are things that are student damaged and also anything that would be billed to the students which would not necessarily be intentional, but accidental." At the end of the year, room checks are made. Students are encouraged to be present for this in order to detect errors. During these room checks, most of the dorm damage is discovered. This damage includes such things as broken chairs and missing smoke alarms. Mr. Rossi said that "the bulk of the damages are going to come from student rooms" and would include "things that are missing, and things that are broken and are not reported earlier in the year." Not all damage done to the dorms and townhouses can be pinpointed. This debt for the damage must then be paid with the tuition by parents. It is a separate item that is included on both the fall and spring bills. Mr. Richard Rossi receives the work orders to repair the damage done to the dorms and townhouses. He receives as many as thirty work orders each day. The maintenance department and the Housing department determine what is considered student damage. Mr. Rossi is the final arbitrator of that, and "gets the See Damage, p. 2 Father Joseph van Beeck, S.J., speaks in the Oakroom. (photo by Ronzoni) Van Beek discusses Christian Worship By Ann Marie Puckhaber Staff Writer "The Christian Church is decisively recognized by its worship," stated Reverend Franz Josef van Beeck, S.J., in his lecture "Risky Worship in a Pagan World: Christian Worship in Pliny's, Letter." On Wednesday, October 14, Father van Beeck, the John Cardinal Cody Professor of Sacred Theology at Loyola University, gave a lecture in the Campus Center Oak Room as part of the Bellarmine Lecture Series by Distinguished Jesuit Scholars. The welcome and introduction were given by Dr. Robert Stepsis, Academic Vice President. Pliny was a Roman official who wrote to the emperor, Trajan, for instructions on how to deal with the Christians. The letter was written in 112 A.-D. Father van Beeck described the letter as a "vivid picture (of Christianity) seen through the eyes of an outsider." He said that the Christians were an urgent problem to the Romans because Christianity seemed to" be "contagious." Father van Beeck's translation of Pliny's letter and Trajan's reply were distributed and read at the lecture. Father van Beeck said that the focal issue in Pliny's letter was "the worship of Christians." Pliny knew that on a fixed day the Christians gathered for a community worship and a common meal. "Liturgical worship is the heart of the the Church," said Father van Beeck. Although the Romans recognized that the Christian service was harmless, Father van Beeck said that they considered Christianity to be a "corrupt and extravagant foreign religion." Whether or not the worship service described in Pliny's letter was the Eucharist can not be determined. However, Father van Beeck said that "there are no compelling reasons to assume that it was not the Eucharist." Many of the Christians were executed by Pliny. Father van Beeck explained that they were punished by death because "the impenitent particularity and the exclusiveness of Christian worship were unacceptable." The Romans were intolerant of the Christians and the Christians refused to be like other religions. Father van Beeck said that the attraction to Christianity was "virtuous living, not notoriety." New Trustees elected By Lynn Ann Casey Staff Writer On Friday, October 9th, the Board of Trustees of Fairfield University elected seven new members at the first half of their four meetings this year. According to Fr. Higgins, S.J., the Assistant to the President, "The new board members represent the diversity of the current board." The board consists of nine Jesuits, four parents of current students, ten alumni, executives, and is comprised of both men and women. All together, there are 36 active Trustees and 7 Trustees Emeriti. Represented are a variety of states including 15 from Fairfield, 10 from New York, and four from Massachusetts. Two new Jesuits were elected. Fr. Richard Curry, S.J., a Jesuit from Philadelphia, is the Founder and Artistic Director of the National Theatre Workshop of the Handicapped in New York City. Joseph Fahey, S.J. is Vice President of Boston College. He had previously served on the board from 1972- 1981. ■— - Two parents of present students were also included on the Board. James Daly, whose daughter Julie is a freshman, is an attorney in New York City, and Jeremy Jacobsis, Chairman and CEO of Delaware North Companies, Inc., whose daughter Katie is a junior. Dennis Dammerman, Senior Vice President for General Electric in Fairifeld, and another new member, has a son who has recently graduated from Fairfield Prep. Also elected were an alumnus of the Class of '67, and a General Partner for Burr, Egan, Delage & Co. in Boston, arid a former resident and community volunteer in Fairfield County now residing in Arlington VA. The Board of Trustees is responsible for making the major policy decisions affecting the course of the University. The board does such things as setting guidelines for future policies, setting goals for building aid resources, recruiting and retaining Jesuits, and faculty resource. They have the final authority on the financial stability of the university. See Board, p. 3 |