Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Increase In Turnout Marks Elections No Write-ins; President Encouraged by John Hughes The Student Legislature, weaken-ed in recent years by lagging in-terest, may be on its way to recovery as the election on Thursday the 12th indicates. The number of candidates increased 140% over last year; 65 students ran for the 35 available positions. Two candidates from Regis tied, making necessary a run-off election to be held in the dorm within a week. Unlike last year, no student was elected by means of a write-in vote. More students turned out to vote than last year, yet only 842 ballots were cast from a student population of over 2700. The turnout about one third of the school, occured despite heavier campaigning and election publicity. Notices of the election were posted at least a week in ad-vance in the Campus Center, the dorms, Canisius, Bannow, and the shuttle. The Legislature represents the en-tire student body while voting on bills dealing with student concerns, yet few students are aware of its poten-tial. "An inactive and isolated legislature is at least partially responsible," explained Jim Connol-ly, acting President of the Legislature. "Treating the Govern-' ment as just 'another club on cam-pus' is a major reason for its ineffec-tiveness in the past. Representatives operate with little direct involvement with the student body." Dave Klim, Chairman of the Government Elections Commission states that, " for too long the legislature has been a 'lame duck' organization. This year there were a full 35 elected and no write-ins. This will mean a stronger legislature." Last year only 28 students ran for the 35 available positions, excluding five who were elected by write in votes. The two remaining spots were never filled. This year showed a 140% in-crease, with 65 candidates. A bill put forth last year to reduce the number of representatives was vetoed. Connolly, who was opposed to the bill, commented, "The more people involved in the legislature, the better. More ideas and input are generated, and there is a better chance of reaching more students. There is plenty of work for every representative." Connolly feels that major em-phasis of the legislature should be to "bring results to the students." Con-nolly stresses opgT) meetings, perhaps in the Oakroom, to make the legislature more accessible to the students. Plans for the legislature in-clude such areas as the extreme temperatures in the library, the poor sound system in Gonzaga Auditorium, and the unresolved basketball ticket situation. REGIS 82 ballots cast Doug Fauth 40 Andy McGowen 40 John Schlahoub 29 Joe Giacino 28 TomCallahan 28 CAMPION 87 ballots cast Jeannie Cuscione 48 Jean Albrecht 26 Vinnie Ferranti 26 FAR EAST 63 ballots cast James Callahan 45 Tony Tarnell 37 Terrence McElgun 34 LOYOLA 63 ballots cast John Fitzgerald 58 Lynne Desmond 45 Greg Magner 30 Election Results GONZAGA 90 ballots cast Brian Bellows 65 Bill Greenwood 52 Jeannie Luglio 43 SOUTHEAST 58 ballots cast Bryan Norwood 37 Lisa Craig 34 COMMUTERS 65 ballots cast Marcia Williams 39 Duane Greenawalt 37 William Burland 37 Shabnam Kapoor 33 Doug Smith 38 Bob Schumm 38 Mark Fredick 45 NORTHWEST 157 ballots cast Jim Connolly 107 George Schietinger 82 Trisha Comey 70 Vinny McLaughlin 68 JULIE HALL 13 ballots cast Pat Conti 10 O.C.B. 184 ballots cast Ed Martin 119 Mark Fitzgerald 96 Christine Newhall 111 Ken Donovan 84 Tim Buckley 78 THE FAIRF1ELD Volume 2, No. 10, October 26,1978 FAIRFIELO UNIVERSITY, FAIRFIELD, CONN. 06430 MIRRORIncorporated 1977 Shuttle Solution Proposed Question of Funding Remains The festivities of Harvest Weekend were kicked off by Kinderhook. The second show was delayed by a fire alarm that proved to be false. (Photo by Alex Graziano) President Search Committee Meets by GiGi Byron FUSA presented their proposal for Campus Shuttle security to Student Services last week, in the hope of returning the shuttle service to its full schedule. Shuttle service had been cut back on weekends because of disciplinary problems during nighttime weekend runs (8:00pm-1am on Friday and Saturday nights.) Student Services had made that decision and given FUSA the option to come up with a proposed solution, subject to ap-proval by Student Services. The Solution that FUSA has come up with has three parts. The first is establishing contact between the bus driver and University Security. This will be done by installing walkie talkies on the bus and in the Security office. A paid post of student rider on the nightime weekend runs will be established as the second part of the proposal. The student rider will col-lect student I.D.'s from every rider. Students will have their I.D.'s return-ed as they get off the bus, provided there has been no trouble. If trouble does occur, the I.D.'s are put in a locked box at the front of the bus, to be sorted the next day. A list of riders will then be submitted to Student Ser-vices, so proper disciplinary action can be taken. The third part of the proposal is a wide-ranging publicity scheme to make students aware of the new "get tough" policy. Kevin Lawlor, FUSA represen-tative and primary author of the pro-posal, said that "the bus drivers are receptive to the idea." He explained that it is "not a foolproof solution, but if it does not work the only solution may be to cancel the bus." When asked what part FUSA would take in the new shuttle policy if it is established, Lawlor answered, "We would recruit riders and we would schedule them." Lawlor sees the only real pro-blems with the new policy is the fun-ding for the student riders. Student Services feels that it is the student's resposibility (FUSA) to pay for the new policy. "We are working on funds now," explained Lawlor. He also added that the solution-finding process has gotten "bogged down by the question of who would pay for it," and that he thinks "Stu-dent Services can handle it financial-ly better than we (FUSA) can." Student Services should have their answer on the proposed policy sometime this week. by Claudia M. Napp The Presidential Search Commit-tee, according to student member Tom Cleary, "is searching for a man •who will: strive for academic ex-cellence; have good financial knowledge, thus keeping the univer-sity in the black; have a genuine in-terest in the students." The committee has had one general meeting to get the search of-ficially started. Mr. L. William Miles, the new chairman of the Board of Trustees and head of the committee, presided over the first meeting. At this time he presented the members with a "general outline approved by the Board of Trustees." The Commit-tee members have also been in-structed to use their own personal guidelines in screening the can-didates. Word has been sent out that the school is looking for a new president, and the committee is now accepting resumes from all interested can-didates. These resumes will be screened by the members and those applicants that best fit the re-quirements will be interviewed before any final decision is made. How the committee will decide upon the three names they will pre-sent to the Board of Trustees, for the Board members final decision, is not yet known. Tom Cleary said he was not sure whether he and his fellow student member of the committee, Linda Stephenson, will have an equal say to that of the representatives from the administration, faculty, board of trustees, community, and alumni in the final outcome. Father Fitzgerald, who is not on the commit-tee himself, feels that the final can-didates presented to the Board of Trustees will be agreed upon by the committee through a consensus of opinion. "In my past experiences in such matters no formal vote has been taken." When asked if the university was limiting its candidates to seeking a Jesuit successor to his position, Father Fitzgerald replied: "It is not implicit that he be a member of the Jesuit Community, but I would like to think that there are many fine can- Continued on Pg. 3 Rinaldi Initiates Core Review Request Self Study By Departments By James Endrst A four phase timetable with guidelines for the review of the core curriculum has been approved by the curriculum committee. The plan was outlined by Dean Nicolas Rinaldi and the first stage is already in motion. Phase One of development, the thrust and the foundation of the en-tire process, will be spent in inter-departmental student discussions, after which each department will submit a position paper on core cur-riculum to Dean Rinaldi by December 15. The position paper will include: the department's philosophy of the core as a whole and a state-ment on the significance of their of-fering within the core; the changes the department would like to imple-ment with respect to their own offer-ings in the core; and the changes they would like to see in respect to the core in other departments. During the second phase, the Dean's Council of Chairmen will "review all position papers (majority and minority) in an effort to form a comprehensive proposal relating to core by February 15. The Curriculum Committee will then review the pro-posal from the Dean's Council will discuss possible changes and am-mendments, finishing their work by the first week in March. In the final phase the 18 member committee will submit the completed proposal to the full faculty for deliberation and a vote at a General Faculty Meeting to be held sometime in the spring. In addition, the departments are being asked to take this opportunity to review their major programs and to submit any proposals that they consider revelant to the core. Albert Anderson, a philosophy teacher at Clark University is Fair-field's curriculum consultant. Mr. Anderson was hired by the University last year after the faculty turned down a proposal from the curriculum committee which was felt to be in-adaquate because it didn't properly address itself to the problems or needs of the core or the univeristy in general. According to Dean Rinaldi, Anderson agreed that the proposal should have been turned down. "The present review is an attempt to start that dialogue again," he said. Fairfield's official statement on the core, defined by the Undergraduate Curriculum Commit-tee and authored by Professor Arthur Riel, Jr., says that "the goal of the university is education, not just a job. In short, Fairfield University trains you for life. To achieve this goal, a basic understanding of science, mathematics, history, the social sciences, composition, literature, foreign languages, fine arts, philosophy, and religion is necessary." Professor Riel, a well known supporter of the core said, "When a man comes looking for a job with a college degree, there are certain things that an employer has a Continued on Pg. 3
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 02, No. 10 - October 26, 1978 |
Date | October 26 1978 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | 19781026 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | Increase In Turnout Marks Elections No Write-ins; President Encouraged by John Hughes The Student Legislature, weaken-ed in recent years by lagging in-terest, may be on its way to recovery as the election on Thursday the 12th indicates. The number of candidates increased 140% over last year; 65 students ran for the 35 available positions. Two candidates from Regis tied, making necessary a run-off election to be held in the dorm within a week. Unlike last year, no student was elected by means of a write-in vote. More students turned out to vote than last year, yet only 842 ballots were cast from a student population of over 2700. The turnout about one third of the school, occured despite heavier campaigning and election publicity. Notices of the election were posted at least a week in ad-vance in the Campus Center, the dorms, Canisius, Bannow, and the shuttle. The Legislature represents the en-tire student body while voting on bills dealing with student concerns, yet few students are aware of its poten-tial. "An inactive and isolated legislature is at least partially responsible," explained Jim Connol-ly, acting President of the Legislature. "Treating the Govern-' ment as just 'another club on cam-pus' is a major reason for its ineffec-tiveness in the past. Representatives operate with little direct involvement with the student body." Dave Klim, Chairman of the Government Elections Commission states that, " for too long the legislature has been a 'lame duck' organization. This year there were a full 35 elected and no write-ins. This will mean a stronger legislature." Last year only 28 students ran for the 35 available positions, excluding five who were elected by write in votes. The two remaining spots were never filled. This year showed a 140% in-crease, with 65 candidates. A bill put forth last year to reduce the number of representatives was vetoed. Connolly, who was opposed to the bill, commented, "The more people involved in the legislature, the better. More ideas and input are generated, and there is a better chance of reaching more students. There is plenty of work for every representative." Connolly feels that major em-phasis of the legislature should be to "bring results to the students." Con-nolly stresses opgT) meetings, perhaps in the Oakroom, to make the legislature more accessible to the students. Plans for the legislature in-clude such areas as the extreme temperatures in the library, the poor sound system in Gonzaga Auditorium, and the unresolved basketball ticket situation. REGIS 82 ballots cast Doug Fauth 40 Andy McGowen 40 John Schlahoub 29 Joe Giacino 28 TomCallahan 28 CAMPION 87 ballots cast Jeannie Cuscione 48 Jean Albrecht 26 Vinnie Ferranti 26 FAR EAST 63 ballots cast James Callahan 45 Tony Tarnell 37 Terrence McElgun 34 LOYOLA 63 ballots cast John Fitzgerald 58 Lynne Desmond 45 Greg Magner 30 Election Results GONZAGA 90 ballots cast Brian Bellows 65 Bill Greenwood 52 Jeannie Luglio 43 SOUTHEAST 58 ballots cast Bryan Norwood 37 Lisa Craig 34 COMMUTERS 65 ballots cast Marcia Williams 39 Duane Greenawalt 37 William Burland 37 Shabnam Kapoor 33 Doug Smith 38 Bob Schumm 38 Mark Fredick 45 NORTHWEST 157 ballots cast Jim Connolly 107 George Schietinger 82 Trisha Comey 70 Vinny McLaughlin 68 JULIE HALL 13 ballots cast Pat Conti 10 O.C.B. 184 ballots cast Ed Martin 119 Mark Fitzgerald 96 Christine Newhall 111 Ken Donovan 84 Tim Buckley 78 THE FAIRF1ELD Volume 2, No. 10, October 26,1978 FAIRFIELO UNIVERSITY, FAIRFIELD, CONN. 06430 MIRRORIncorporated 1977 Shuttle Solution Proposed Question of Funding Remains The festivities of Harvest Weekend were kicked off by Kinderhook. The second show was delayed by a fire alarm that proved to be false. (Photo by Alex Graziano) President Search Committee Meets by GiGi Byron FUSA presented their proposal for Campus Shuttle security to Student Services last week, in the hope of returning the shuttle service to its full schedule. Shuttle service had been cut back on weekends because of disciplinary problems during nighttime weekend runs (8:00pm-1am on Friday and Saturday nights.) Student Services had made that decision and given FUSA the option to come up with a proposed solution, subject to ap-proval by Student Services. The Solution that FUSA has come up with has three parts. The first is establishing contact between the bus driver and University Security. This will be done by installing walkie talkies on the bus and in the Security office. A paid post of student rider on the nightime weekend runs will be established as the second part of the proposal. The student rider will col-lect student I.D.'s from every rider. Students will have their I.D.'s return-ed as they get off the bus, provided there has been no trouble. If trouble does occur, the I.D.'s are put in a locked box at the front of the bus, to be sorted the next day. A list of riders will then be submitted to Student Ser-vices, so proper disciplinary action can be taken. The third part of the proposal is a wide-ranging publicity scheme to make students aware of the new "get tough" policy. Kevin Lawlor, FUSA represen-tative and primary author of the pro-posal, said that "the bus drivers are receptive to the idea." He explained that it is "not a foolproof solution, but if it does not work the only solution may be to cancel the bus." When asked what part FUSA would take in the new shuttle policy if it is established, Lawlor answered, "We would recruit riders and we would schedule them." Lawlor sees the only real pro-blems with the new policy is the fun-ding for the student riders. Student Services feels that it is the student's resposibility (FUSA) to pay for the new policy. "We are working on funds now," explained Lawlor. He also added that the solution-finding process has gotten "bogged down by the question of who would pay for it," and that he thinks "Stu-dent Services can handle it financial-ly better than we (FUSA) can." Student Services should have their answer on the proposed policy sometime this week. by Claudia M. Napp The Presidential Search Commit-tee, according to student member Tom Cleary, "is searching for a man •who will: strive for academic ex-cellence; have good financial knowledge, thus keeping the univer-sity in the black; have a genuine in-terest in the students." The committee has had one general meeting to get the search of-ficially started. Mr. L. William Miles, the new chairman of the Board of Trustees and head of the committee, presided over the first meeting. At this time he presented the members with a "general outline approved by the Board of Trustees." The Commit-tee members have also been in-structed to use their own personal guidelines in screening the can-didates. Word has been sent out that the school is looking for a new president, and the committee is now accepting resumes from all interested can-didates. These resumes will be screened by the members and those applicants that best fit the re-quirements will be interviewed before any final decision is made. How the committee will decide upon the three names they will pre-sent to the Board of Trustees, for the Board members final decision, is not yet known. Tom Cleary said he was not sure whether he and his fellow student member of the committee, Linda Stephenson, will have an equal say to that of the representatives from the administration, faculty, board of trustees, community, and alumni in the final outcome. Father Fitzgerald, who is not on the commit-tee himself, feels that the final can-didates presented to the Board of Trustees will be agreed upon by the committee through a consensus of opinion. "In my past experiences in such matters no formal vote has been taken." When asked if the university was limiting its candidates to seeking a Jesuit successor to his position, Father Fitzgerald replied: "It is not implicit that he be a member of the Jesuit Community, but I would like to think that there are many fine can- Continued on Pg. 3 Rinaldi Initiates Core Review Request Self Study By Departments By James Endrst A four phase timetable with guidelines for the review of the core curriculum has been approved by the curriculum committee. The plan was outlined by Dean Nicolas Rinaldi and the first stage is already in motion. Phase One of development, the thrust and the foundation of the en-tire process, will be spent in inter-departmental student discussions, after which each department will submit a position paper on core cur-riculum to Dean Rinaldi by December 15. The position paper will include: the department's philosophy of the core as a whole and a state-ment on the significance of their of-fering within the core; the changes the department would like to imple-ment with respect to their own offer-ings in the core; and the changes they would like to see in respect to the core in other departments. During the second phase, the Dean's Council of Chairmen will "review all position papers (majority and minority) in an effort to form a comprehensive proposal relating to core by February 15. The Curriculum Committee will then review the pro-posal from the Dean's Council will discuss possible changes and am-mendments, finishing their work by the first week in March. In the final phase the 18 member committee will submit the completed proposal to the full faculty for deliberation and a vote at a General Faculty Meeting to be held sometime in the spring. In addition, the departments are being asked to take this opportunity to review their major programs and to submit any proposals that they consider revelant to the core. Albert Anderson, a philosophy teacher at Clark University is Fair-field's curriculum consultant. Mr. Anderson was hired by the University last year after the faculty turned down a proposal from the curriculum committee which was felt to be in-adaquate because it didn't properly address itself to the problems or needs of the core or the univeristy in general. According to Dean Rinaldi, Anderson agreed that the proposal should have been turned down. "The present review is an attempt to start that dialogue again," he said. Fairfield's official statement on the core, defined by the Undergraduate Curriculum Commit-tee and authored by Professor Arthur Riel, Jr., says that "the goal of the university is education, not just a job. In short, Fairfield University trains you for life. To achieve this goal, a basic understanding of science, mathematics, history, the social sciences, composition, literature, foreign languages, fine arts, philosophy, and religion is necessary." Professor Riel, a well known supporter of the core said, "When a man comes looking for a job with a college degree, there are certain things that an employer has a Continued on Pg. 3 |