Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
The FairfieldMIRRORv Volume 9, No. 19 Thursday, December 5, 1985 The Image of Fairfield The Naut closes, may reopen in Spring by Jeanne Burke and Stephen J. Humes The Nautilus Cafe was forced to close its doors on Monday, December 2nd, as a result of a Sheriffs notice issued to its leasee, William Daniel Gregorio. Financial problems, health and fire code violations were cited as reasons for the shutdown by both the landlord and the Naut's former owner. According to Steven Levine, who owns the building, the bar will be renovated. He is not sure what he will do with it after the renovations are completed. He said he will probably re-open it this spring, possibly with a new name. Levine commented, "It's time that the place is cleaned up anyway." The building in which the Naut is locat-ed has been standing since before the Depression. It has been known as the Nau-tilus since 1965, when it was taken over by the Gregorio family. The most recent own-er, known as Barney to many of the Naut's local patrons, took over the business when his father died. He was forced to close by Superior Court Justice Judge Thomas C. Gerety, who ruled last week that Levine could take over the business. Levine said that Gregorio's business was hurt by the rise in the state's drinking age, noting, "Once you outgrow being a kid, this isn't the type of place you want to come to." The building also had many violations ac-cording to Levine, because the electrical and plumbing systems have not been up-graded recently. The massive renovations involved will probably keep the Naut closed over the winter. Levine commented,"After all, this is a landmark, it has to be done right." Gregorio said that Levine called inspec-tors to the property regarding electrical cords loose by the front windows, and due to a fire exit in the back which was bolted shut. "They told me to clean the place up," said Gregorio. He added that he complied with requests by authorities and freed the blocked fire exit. Gregorio said he cleaned the bar every day. The Naut has been the primary bar for Fairfield University students for over 20 years. Gregorio said, "I've seen more Fair-field U. kids go through my place than you can imagine. God bless you kids." Gregorio and his lawyers are working to try and recover financially for the court ord-er which "gave the business toLevine," said Gregorio. "I think the courts are very un-fair that a man can run a business for 25 years and have it wiped out from under him," said Gregorio. Levine said that the upgrading ofthe Naut will be good for the neighborhood. He doesn't know yet whether he will be able to find a new tenant or will open the busi-ness himself, but Levine predicts that it will be, "a nice place to come to... a place you could be proud of." The Naut, a Fairfield tradition, closes its doors to all business N.Y. raises legal age to 21, students irate ALBANY, N.Y. (AP)-Raising New York's minimum drinking age from 19 to 21, starting today, should make roads safer by cutting down on drunken driving, state officials say, but they acknowledge that Washington's threat to withhold $90 mil-lion in highway funds also was a con-sideration. College students are grousing about the new law, but some say they expect to keep on drinking anyway. New York joins 31 other states that al-ready have a minimum drinking age of 21. Connecticut raised its minimum age from 20 to 21 as of Sept. 1. Another five states have approved legislation to raise their drinking ages to 21 sometime next year. New York's drinking age was raised from 18 to 19 in 1982. A proposal at the State University ofNew York at Albany to ban all beer kegs from dormitories met with a student petition drive and a mass call-in to the president and vice-president that tied up telephone lines. Unlike states such as Connecticut, New York's "grandfather" clause that would preserve the right to purchase alcoholic beverages for those who were of legal age before the new law. To prevent young men and women from losing jobs in restaurants and taverns, however, the laws permits 18-year-olds to serve alcoholic beverages on the job. Anyone under 21 who attempts to pur-chase an alcholic beverage through fraudu-lent means is subject to fines of $100 and a year's probation. Those 21 or older who buy alcohol for underage drinkers face fines up to $500 and 90 days in jail. Bars, restaur-ants and clubs may lose their liquor licenses if they are caught serving minors. Student leaders opposed the law, argu-ing it unfairly punishes the majority of 19- and 20-year-olds who don't drive when they are drunk. "Nineteeen and 20-year-olds are not like-ly to alter their alcohol consumption or drinking behavior regardless of the status of the purchase age," said Jane McAlevey, president of the Student Association of the State University of New York. "The only thing that will change is the way in which they will obtain alcohol." Proponents say the law will prevent 2,300 highway deaths and injuries over the next two years, save millions of dollars in health care and property damage costs and signifi-cantly reduce alcohol abuse among teenagers. State officials say they saw definite benefits from raising the drinking age to 19. According to the state Department of Mo-tor Vehicles, there were 2,584 injuries or deaths from accidents in 1981 involving 16-, 17-,and 18-year-old drivers who had too much to drink. Three years later, there were 1,551 injuries or deaths from acci-dents involving the same age group. Nineteen and 20-year-olds represent about 4 percent of New York's licensed drivers, but drivers from that age group are involved in 12.4f percent of alcohol-related accidents resulting in injuries or death, said William Stevens, a spokesman for the state Division of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse. Priest presents moral dilemma on apartheid by Stephen J. Humes The issue of apartheid South Africa was presented by a third lecturer for the Fall semester on Tuesday, by a catholic priest who claims it is immoral to divest and dis-invest. Rev. Oliver Williams, O.S.C., a profes-sor of Management and Ethics at the University of Notre Dame, spoke in a lec-ture presented by Fairfield's program in Ap- Rev. Oliver Williams, O.S.C. [Photo by Karen Haney] plied Ethics. He was introduced by Dr. Lisa Newton, the program's coordinator. Williams focused his discussion on moral and ethical considerations by the business world. For Williams, there are three posi-tions from which U.S. companies doing business in South Africa can choose. "They can wash their hands and pull out, they can put pressure on the government to change their policies, or they can mobilize resistance, say the apartheid system is wrong, and get out." Williams takes the second choice. "I would argue it is the moral thing to do to stay in." Williams added, "I believe the eco-nomic pressures and protests and external pressure has some hope in overcoming apartheid." Williams defends his position by saying the U.S. companies in South Africa have already defeated the apartheid's system of racial separation within their own work en-vironments. "I think it's true to say that in the workplace, it (apartheid) is being over-come." Williams, who spent the summer in South Africa and touring for Notre Dame, said "there essentially was no dis-crimination in the workplace." Williams claims that U.S. companies have violated laws by allowing equal pay for equal work, blacks to hold responsible positions, and racial mixes while eating lunches. The problems, according to Wil-liams, rise when blacks and whites leave the plants. "It doesn't matter how much money they have, the blacks can't own good land because the whites have it all." The blacks must carry their identification papers at all times, and live in segragated areas of towns and cities. Williams said that the U.S. companies have all agreed to the Sullivan Principles, a group of statements against the apartheid system postulated by Leon Sullivan, a pas-tor of a protestant church in Philadelphia. He said Sullivan added another principle: that every company must affectively lobby the government to change. Sullivan gave his challenge two years and said he will ad-vocate massive pullouts and demonstrations if the government does not change its apart-heid policies by May of 1987. The lecture was the last in a series of university presentations on the South Afri-ca issues. Athol Fugard and Donald Woods both spoke earlier in the semester. A.J. Winder scores against Utica in last Mon-day's win. Stags are now 2-1 on the season. See Sports. [Photo by Remy Steiner] INSIDE THIS WEEK News 1, 2, 3 Editorials 4 Science Week 5 Politics 6,7 Tour Guides Features .... 8, 9 Features 10, 11 Arts & Entertainment 13 Classified/Crossword 14 Sports 15, 16
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 09, No. 19 - December 05, 1985 |
Date | December 05 1985 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19851205 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | The FairfieldMIRRORv Volume 9, No. 19 Thursday, December 5, 1985 The Image of Fairfield The Naut closes, may reopen in Spring by Jeanne Burke and Stephen J. Humes The Nautilus Cafe was forced to close its doors on Monday, December 2nd, as a result of a Sheriffs notice issued to its leasee, William Daniel Gregorio. Financial problems, health and fire code violations were cited as reasons for the shutdown by both the landlord and the Naut's former owner. According to Steven Levine, who owns the building, the bar will be renovated. He is not sure what he will do with it after the renovations are completed. He said he will probably re-open it this spring, possibly with a new name. Levine commented, "It's time that the place is cleaned up anyway." The building in which the Naut is locat-ed has been standing since before the Depression. It has been known as the Nau-tilus since 1965, when it was taken over by the Gregorio family. The most recent own-er, known as Barney to many of the Naut's local patrons, took over the business when his father died. He was forced to close by Superior Court Justice Judge Thomas C. Gerety, who ruled last week that Levine could take over the business. Levine said that Gregorio's business was hurt by the rise in the state's drinking age, noting, "Once you outgrow being a kid, this isn't the type of place you want to come to." The building also had many violations ac-cording to Levine, because the electrical and plumbing systems have not been up-graded recently. The massive renovations involved will probably keep the Naut closed over the winter. Levine commented,"After all, this is a landmark, it has to be done right." Gregorio said that Levine called inspec-tors to the property regarding electrical cords loose by the front windows, and due to a fire exit in the back which was bolted shut. "They told me to clean the place up," said Gregorio. He added that he complied with requests by authorities and freed the blocked fire exit. Gregorio said he cleaned the bar every day. The Naut has been the primary bar for Fairfield University students for over 20 years. Gregorio said, "I've seen more Fair-field U. kids go through my place than you can imagine. God bless you kids." Gregorio and his lawyers are working to try and recover financially for the court ord-er which "gave the business toLevine," said Gregorio. "I think the courts are very un-fair that a man can run a business for 25 years and have it wiped out from under him," said Gregorio. Levine said that the upgrading ofthe Naut will be good for the neighborhood. He doesn't know yet whether he will be able to find a new tenant or will open the busi-ness himself, but Levine predicts that it will be, "a nice place to come to... a place you could be proud of." The Naut, a Fairfield tradition, closes its doors to all business N.Y. raises legal age to 21, students irate ALBANY, N.Y. (AP)-Raising New York's minimum drinking age from 19 to 21, starting today, should make roads safer by cutting down on drunken driving, state officials say, but they acknowledge that Washington's threat to withhold $90 mil-lion in highway funds also was a con-sideration. College students are grousing about the new law, but some say they expect to keep on drinking anyway. New York joins 31 other states that al-ready have a minimum drinking age of 21. Connecticut raised its minimum age from 20 to 21 as of Sept. 1. Another five states have approved legislation to raise their drinking ages to 21 sometime next year. New York's drinking age was raised from 18 to 19 in 1982. A proposal at the State University ofNew York at Albany to ban all beer kegs from dormitories met with a student petition drive and a mass call-in to the president and vice-president that tied up telephone lines. Unlike states such as Connecticut, New York's "grandfather" clause that would preserve the right to purchase alcoholic beverages for those who were of legal age before the new law. To prevent young men and women from losing jobs in restaurants and taverns, however, the laws permits 18-year-olds to serve alcoholic beverages on the job. Anyone under 21 who attempts to pur-chase an alcholic beverage through fraudu-lent means is subject to fines of $100 and a year's probation. Those 21 or older who buy alcohol for underage drinkers face fines up to $500 and 90 days in jail. Bars, restaur-ants and clubs may lose their liquor licenses if they are caught serving minors. Student leaders opposed the law, argu-ing it unfairly punishes the majority of 19- and 20-year-olds who don't drive when they are drunk. "Nineteeen and 20-year-olds are not like-ly to alter their alcohol consumption or drinking behavior regardless of the status of the purchase age," said Jane McAlevey, president of the Student Association of the State University of New York. "The only thing that will change is the way in which they will obtain alcohol." Proponents say the law will prevent 2,300 highway deaths and injuries over the next two years, save millions of dollars in health care and property damage costs and signifi-cantly reduce alcohol abuse among teenagers. State officials say they saw definite benefits from raising the drinking age to 19. According to the state Department of Mo-tor Vehicles, there were 2,584 injuries or deaths from accidents in 1981 involving 16-, 17-,and 18-year-old drivers who had too much to drink. Three years later, there were 1,551 injuries or deaths from acci-dents involving the same age group. Nineteen and 20-year-olds represent about 4 percent of New York's licensed drivers, but drivers from that age group are involved in 12.4f percent of alcohol-related accidents resulting in injuries or death, said William Stevens, a spokesman for the state Division of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse. Priest presents moral dilemma on apartheid by Stephen J. Humes The issue of apartheid South Africa was presented by a third lecturer for the Fall semester on Tuesday, by a catholic priest who claims it is immoral to divest and dis-invest. Rev. Oliver Williams, O.S.C., a profes-sor of Management and Ethics at the University of Notre Dame, spoke in a lec-ture presented by Fairfield's program in Ap- Rev. Oliver Williams, O.S.C. [Photo by Karen Haney] plied Ethics. He was introduced by Dr. Lisa Newton, the program's coordinator. Williams focused his discussion on moral and ethical considerations by the business world. For Williams, there are three posi-tions from which U.S. companies doing business in South Africa can choose. "They can wash their hands and pull out, they can put pressure on the government to change their policies, or they can mobilize resistance, say the apartheid system is wrong, and get out." Williams takes the second choice. "I would argue it is the moral thing to do to stay in." Williams added, "I believe the eco-nomic pressures and protests and external pressure has some hope in overcoming apartheid." Williams defends his position by saying the U.S. companies in South Africa have already defeated the apartheid's system of racial separation within their own work en-vironments. "I think it's true to say that in the workplace, it (apartheid) is being over-come." Williams, who spent the summer in South Africa and touring for Notre Dame, said "there essentially was no dis-crimination in the workplace." Williams claims that U.S. companies have violated laws by allowing equal pay for equal work, blacks to hold responsible positions, and racial mixes while eating lunches. The problems, according to Wil-liams, rise when blacks and whites leave the plants. "It doesn't matter how much money they have, the blacks can't own good land because the whites have it all." The blacks must carry their identification papers at all times, and live in segragated areas of towns and cities. Williams said that the U.S. companies have all agreed to the Sullivan Principles, a group of statements against the apartheid system postulated by Leon Sullivan, a pas-tor of a protestant church in Philadelphia. He said Sullivan added another principle: that every company must affectively lobby the government to change. Sullivan gave his challenge two years and said he will ad-vocate massive pullouts and demonstrations if the government does not change its apart-heid policies by May of 1987. The lecture was the last in a series of university presentations on the South Afri-ca issues. Athol Fugard and Donald Woods both spoke earlier in the semester. A.J. Winder scores against Utica in last Mon-day's win. Stags are now 2-1 on the season. See Sports. [Photo by Remy Steiner] INSIDE THIS WEEK News 1, 2, 3 Editorials 4 Science Week 5 Politics 6,7 Tour Guides Features .... 8, 9 Features 10, 11 Arts & Entertainment 13 Classified/Crossword 14 Sports 15, 16 |