Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
"The Image of Fairfield" FAIRFIELD W \ [MIRROR] ■AWf. Nonprofit Organization U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 32 Fairfield, Conn. Volume 7, No. 16 Thursday, February 2, 1984 Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06430 Incorporated 197. Record Voter Turn Out Kenneally Defeats McCarthy By 4-1 Margin by Christine Ryan In a surprise landslide win, junior Fran Kenneally captured the F.U.S.A. presidency with seventy-three percent of the 1975 votes cast, defeating his opponent Phil McCarthy. Almost two-thirds of the eligible voters participated, casting 1226 votes for Ken-neally, 300 for McCarthy, 87 for Mike Habetz a write-in candidate, and 22 other write-in votes. Kenneally had mixed emotions over his wide margin, "I would have rather it had been closer. I am happy with the victory, but at'the same time, Phil is a good friend." He attributed his success to the "incredible" organization of his campaign and campaign manager Christine D'addio. McCarthy felt that they "both got a lot out of the election, and Fran will do a fantastic job. I feel fantastic about the people I had working for me. They are the best people in the school." Phil has agreed to be involved in Kenneally's cabinet, and believed that they "definitely became better friends" through this campaign. There were many questions raised con-cerning the last minute write-in campaignof freshman Mike Habetz. His onslaught of publicity on election day generated some controversy. His decision to run v^s "not because the candidates were not compe-tent, but because their campaigns were bor-ing and detrimental." He felt the students needed another choice. Kenneally thought that Habetz was run-ning for the wrong reasons, and was glad that his votes did not have an impact on the results. "I am proud of the Fairfield voters who saw through it and took the election seriously," he stated. McCarthy commend-ed Habetz, and declared, "I think it was fan-tastic that a freshman had the guts to do that." The president elect stated, "The debate helped me. I believe in what I proposed and it came through during the discussions. I have a lot of confidence in my platform ideas. There was a good deal of positive publicity which generated tremendous in-terest around campus. The support was evi-dent in the number of students who voted and who participated in the individual cam-paigns. According to Lisa LaGuardia, Assistant Director of University Activities, "This is the most extensive campaign in a long while. Each candidate had strong, extensive cam-paign strategies, from bookmarks to table tents." Both candidates were interested in work-ing together next year. Kenneally is anxious to utilize McCarthy's talents. "That is an im-portant part of my strategy-to get the tal-ented students involved in student govern-ment." McCarthy declared that "There will definitely be a blending of platform ideas." Kenneally declared, "My campaign reach-ed that certain point, beyond which the electorate says, No, no more. I felt we had just the right amount of positive publicity." "We are confident in Fran's strong leadership qualities, and felt that he had a more extensive background," declared Maria Malatak '86, and Josie Schmeisser '86. "The debate on vido tape influenced our decisions. We felt Fran was better prepared and less shaky." The pressing isues concer-ning these voters were lack of study space and lack of non-alcoholic activities in the Stag-Her Inn. As a sophomore who supported Mike Habetz, Rick Smith "liked his attitude, he was poking fun at the other two who were overcampaigriing." He felt the "Fogg" can-didate was a viable alternative. Fran Kenneally wins FUSA presidency. Faculty Denounces Weapons by Chris Tyler A letter, which was published in the January 26 issue of the Mirror, was written and signed Budgeting Leads to $25,000 Surplus by Richard D. Fahey and Daniel P. Miles According to William J. Luces, Vice Presi-dent for Finance, Rev. Aloyius P. Kelley, S.J., President of Fairfield University should not have had any nightmares about the financial condition of the University. Mr. Lucas said, "The overall financial condition of the University is very strong". One strong indication of this is that this past June marked the thirteenth consecutive year that Fairfield University operated in the black, with approximately at $25,000 surplus last year. Mr. Lucas pointed out that there were three reasons why the University has main-tained surpluses for more than a decade. These reasons were realistic budgeting which provides for growth, strong enroll-ments and budgeting accurately for unex-pected expenses. Mr. Lucas said "Another sign of the University's financial strength is the endow-ment,, which for years was in the hundreds continued on page 2 University Plans Communications Major by Dana Agnello "Many students and new applicants have expressed an interest in a communications major, " stated Rev. Francis McFarland, S.J., Director of the Communications minor. Definite plans have been made for the ad-dition of a communications major to Fair-field's College of Arts and Sciences. Students will be able to declare a communi-cations major by September 1985, or possi-bly by January 1985, according to Fr. McFarland. At present the minor, started in 1979, has 132 students. It requires 18 credits in three areas: Writing, Theory and Area (of concen-tration). "The Media Center is well equipped and the equipment is good, but the space is not enough," said Rev. McFarland. To have a major, new equipment may be needed and new courses offered. "Radio must be in-troduced. At present it is weak." Also, there are not enough journalism courses. To answer the need for new courses to ex-pand upon the ones now existing and to open new fields of interest, a plan for the gradual addition of courses until 1991 has been writ-ten up. The plan includes Basic Verbal com-munications, Human Communications and the Media as introductory courses. The re-maining courses will be distributed under Visual Literacy, General Courses and Area of Concentration. These areas cover writing, theory and specific interests, respectively. New teachers will be hired to accommodate the increase in courses, said Fr. McFarland. Interviews will probably be starting in Sep-tember 1985. Teachers will be hired accord-ing to the need prescribed by the new plan. "What is needed is an expert whose whole area is communications." Students who are communications minors will be able to switch to communications major, stated Rev. McFarland, as long as they have the room in their schedules for the additional courses. The chairman of the Communications Department, Rev. Francis McFarland, S.J., work-ed in India before coming to Fairfield two years ago. [Photo by John J. Pastorelle] by members of the Fairfield University faculty in an effort to gain support for a resolution to de-lay deployment of the Pershing II and Cruise mis-siles in western Europe. Dr. Cassidy, one of the faculty members who supported the letter, said, "The list of faculty members who did sign would be much longer had the letter been circulated to all members. In the interest of getting the letter out quickly it was sent only to people who belong to the Working Group on Justice and Peace." The general attitude of the people who signed was one of deep concern. The faculty wishes to be seen as a large group of people taking a visi-ble position. Dr. Paul Lakeland, Professor of Re-ligious Studies, stated "We should not take a po-sition, but rather be seen as taking a position." The U.S. missiles are currently deployed to off-set the presence of Soviet SS 20's. The majori-ty of the faculty who signed the letter feel that President Reagan is honestly doing what he feels is best for the country. They do feel, however, that he is perhaps misguided in his be-lief that the missiles are necessary in that part of the world. The faculty that signed the letter did so from both the ethical stand point that these weapons are great tools of destruction and have no other purpose than to destroy life and from the eco-logical standpoint that the enviornment would be inhospitable for human life following a nuclear war. The missiles greatly increase tension in that region. It is because of the fact that these missiles deliver their warhead in only six to eight minutes that most feel an escalation of the arms race will be a result of deploying mis-siles in that area of the world. The argument for the missile presence is to provide a strong deterrent towards nuclear war, but Dr. King Dykeman, Professor of Philosophy affirmed, "...the ends never justify the means." Some of the faculty who signed the letter feel that the mere possession of nuclear weapons is immoral but most feel that their use is definitely immoral. The major aim of their letter was to inspire those who read it to act. They hope that people will write to their representatives in support for the freeze on the deployment of the missiles. Said Dr. Dew, "You can sit on your hands and moan or do something.'' Those who signed the letter hope to recruit others to take a position on this one issue.
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 07, No. 16 - February 02, 1984 |
Date | February 02 1984 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR19840202 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | "The Image of Fairfield" FAIRFIELD W \ [MIRROR] ■AWf. Nonprofit Organization U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 32 Fairfield, Conn. Volume 7, No. 16 Thursday, February 2, 1984 Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06430 Incorporated 197. Record Voter Turn Out Kenneally Defeats McCarthy By 4-1 Margin by Christine Ryan In a surprise landslide win, junior Fran Kenneally captured the F.U.S.A. presidency with seventy-three percent of the 1975 votes cast, defeating his opponent Phil McCarthy. Almost two-thirds of the eligible voters participated, casting 1226 votes for Ken-neally, 300 for McCarthy, 87 for Mike Habetz a write-in candidate, and 22 other write-in votes. Kenneally had mixed emotions over his wide margin, "I would have rather it had been closer. I am happy with the victory, but at'the same time, Phil is a good friend." He attributed his success to the "incredible" organization of his campaign and campaign manager Christine D'addio. McCarthy felt that they "both got a lot out of the election, and Fran will do a fantastic job. I feel fantastic about the people I had working for me. They are the best people in the school." Phil has agreed to be involved in Kenneally's cabinet, and believed that they "definitely became better friends" through this campaign. There were many questions raised con-cerning the last minute write-in campaignof freshman Mike Habetz. His onslaught of publicity on election day generated some controversy. His decision to run v^s "not because the candidates were not compe-tent, but because their campaigns were bor-ing and detrimental." He felt the students needed another choice. Kenneally thought that Habetz was run-ning for the wrong reasons, and was glad that his votes did not have an impact on the results. "I am proud of the Fairfield voters who saw through it and took the election seriously," he stated. McCarthy commend-ed Habetz, and declared, "I think it was fan-tastic that a freshman had the guts to do that." The president elect stated, "The debate helped me. I believe in what I proposed and it came through during the discussions. I have a lot of confidence in my platform ideas. There was a good deal of positive publicity which generated tremendous in-terest around campus. The support was evi-dent in the number of students who voted and who participated in the individual cam-paigns. According to Lisa LaGuardia, Assistant Director of University Activities, "This is the most extensive campaign in a long while. Each candidate had strong, extensive cam-paign strategies, from bookmarks to table tents." Both candidates were interested in work-ing together next year. Kenneally is anxious to utilize McCarthy's talents. "That is an im-portant part of my strategy-to get the tal-ented students involved in student govern-ment." McCarthy declared that "There will definitely be a blending of platform ideas." Kenneally declared, "My campaign reach-ed that certain point, beyond which the electorate says, No, no more. I felt we had just the right amount of positive publicity." "We are confident in Fran's strong leadership qualities, and felt that he had a more extensive background," declared Maria Malatak '86, and Josie Schmeisser '86. "The debate on vido tape influenced our decisions. We felt Fran was better prepared and less shaky." The pressing isues concer-ning these voters were lack of study space and lack of non-alcoholic activities in the Stag-Her Inn. As a sophomore who supported Mike Habetz, Rick Smith "liked his attitude, he was poking fun at the other two who were overcampaigriing." He felt the "Fogg" can-didate was a viable alternative. Fran Kenneally wins FUSA presidency. Faculty Denounces Weapons by Chris Tyler A letter, which was published in the January 26 issue of the Mirror, was written and signed Budgeting Leads to $25,000 Surplus by Richard D. Fahey and Daniel P. Miles According to William J. Luces, Vice Presi-dent for Finance, Rev. Aloyius P. Kelley, S.J., President of Fairfield University should not have had any nightmares about the financial condition of the University. Mr. Lucas said, "The overall financial condition of the University is very strong". One strong indication of this is that this past June marked the thirteenth consecutive year that Fairfield University operated in the black, with approximately at $25,000 surplus last year. Mr. Lucas pointed out that there were three reasons why the University has main-tained surpluses for more than a decade. These reasons were realistic budgeting which provides for growth, strong enroll-ments and budgeting accurately for unex-pected expenses. Mr. Lucas said "Another sign of the University's financial strength is the endow-ment,, which for years was in the hundreds continued on page 2 University Plans Communications Major by Dana Agnello "Many students and new applicants have expressed an interest in a communications major, " stated Rev. Francis McFarland, S.J., Director of the Communications minor. Definite plans have been made for the ad-dition of a communications major to Fair-field's College of Arts and Sciences. Students will be able to declare a communi-cations major by September 1985, or possi-bly by January 1985, according to Fr. McFarland. At present the minor, started in 1979, has 132 students. It requires 18 credits in three areas: Writing, Theory and Area (of concen-tration). "The Media Center is well equipped and the equipment is good, but the space is not enough," said Rev. McFarland. To have a major, new equipment may be needed and new courses offered. "Radio must be in-troduced. At present it is weak." Also, there are not enough journalism courses. To answer the need for new courses to ex-pand upon the ones now existing and to open new fields of interest, a plan for the gradual addition of courses until 1991 has been writ-ten up. The plan includes Basic Verbal com-munications, Human Communications and the Media as introductory courses. The re-maining courses will be distributed under Visual Literacy, General Courses and Area of Concentration. These areas cover writing, theory and specific interests, respectively. New teachers will be hired to accommodate the increase in courses, said Fr. McFarland. Interviews will probably be starting in Sep-tember 1985. Teachers will be hired accord-ing to the need prescribed by the new plan. "What is needed is an expert whose whole area is communications." Students who are communications minors will be able to switch to communications major, stated Rev. McFarland, as long as they have the room in their schedules for the additional courses. The chairman of the Communications Department, Rev. Francis McFarland, S.J., work-ed in India before coming to Fairfield two years ago. [Photo by John J. Pastorelle] by members of the Fairfield University faculty in an effort to gain support for a resolution to de-lay deployment of the Pershing II and Cruise mis-siles in western Europe. Dr. Cassidy, one of the faculty members who supported the letter, said, "The list of faculty members who did sign would be much longer had the letter been circulated to all members. In the interest of getting the letter out quickly it was sent only to people who belong to the Working Group on Justice and Peace." The general attitude of the people who signed was one of deep concern. The faculty wishes to be seen as a large group of people taking a visi-ble position. Dr. Paul Lakeland, Professor of Re-ligious Studies, stated "We should not take a po-sition, but rather be seen as taking a position." The U.S. missiles are currently deployed to off-set the presence of Soviet SS 20's. The majori-ty of the faculty who signed the letter feel that President Reagan is honestly doing what he feels is best for the country. They do feel, however, that he is perhaps misguided in his be-lief that the missiles are necessary in that part of the world. The faculty that signed the letter did so from both the ethical stand point that these weapons are great tools of destruction and have no other purpose than to destroy life and from the eco-logical standpoint that the enviornment would be inhospitable for human life following a nuclear war. The missiles greatly increase tension in that region. It is because of the fact that these missiles deliver their warhead in only six to eight minutes that most feel an escalation of the arms race will be a result of deploying mis-siles in that area of the world. The argument for the missile presence is to provide a strong deterrent towards nuclear war, but Dr. King Dykeman, Professor of Philosophy affirmed, "...the ends never justify the means." Some of the faculty who signed the letter feel that the mere possession of nuclear weapons is immoral but most feel that their use is definitely immoral. The major aim of their letter was to inspire those who read it to act. They hope that people will write to their representatives in support for the freeze on the deployment of the missiles. Said Dr. Dew, "You can sit on your hands and moan or do something.'' Those who signed the letter hope to recruit others to take a position on this one issue. |