Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
I1 THE (^MIRROR Week of September 12,2012 • Vol. 38, Iss 1 • The Reflection ofFairfield • Independent Student Newspaper of Fairfield University Fairfield U car fire victim still in critical condition BY LOAN LE EXECUTIVE EDITOR A Fairfield University student remains in critical condition after being badly burned in a car fire. Part-time student Justin Hervey, 23, of Armonk, N.Y., was rushed to Bridgeport Hospital last Thursday evening after he and his Chevrolet Tahoe caught fire near Tunxis Hill Park in Fairfield, Conn. According to a Connecticut Postarticle, a Littie League baseball game was in progress when coach-es and parents noticed Hervey on fire near the field. Hervey had pulled into the parking lot when the car started having trouble. Coaches immediately rushed over and tried to extinguish the flames. This quick thinking was "heroic and should be applauded," said Assistant Fire Chief Scott Bis-son in the article. Hervey was still conscious when emergency personnel ar-rived on scene. As of late Tuesday night, Hervey's condition remains criti-cal, according to Bridgeport Hos-pital spokesperson John Cappiel-lo. Hervey's sister, Stephanie Hervey '13, said that her family is hoping for the best. "He's still in critical condition," she said. "He will be for a few months, but. . . he's pulling through right now so hopefully he will continue to do so." Word about Hervey's condi-tion spread to the University com-munity the day after the incident. In an email released to the community on Friday, Vice Presi-dent for Student Affairs Thomas Pellegrino wrote: "We are moni-toring his situation closely and University staff members have ex-tended support to his family, who is with him at this time." Pellegrino also offered students and faculty counseling options. Because the accident is cur-rently under investigation, little Stephen Krauchick/Doingitlocal.com Investigations are still underway regarding the cause of the fire that resulted in a Fairfield student's serious injury. information about the cause of the fire is available, according to a Fairfield Fire Department official. However, in a Hartford Courant ar-ticle, Sergeant Suzanne Lussier, a Fairfield Police spokesperson, said that the fire originated in the pas-senger compartment of Hervey's car. Stephanie called Hervey the "shining star" of the family and "the best brother I could have ever asked for." Hervey's family asked that people continue to pray for him. Fairfield University remembers 9/11 SEPTEMBER 111 PAGE 3 Jeaninne Nocera/The Mirror 3r @MirrorFairfield fairfieldmirror.com MOU approved BY MARTIN O'SULLIVAN EDITOR-IN-CHIEF After months of debate and protest, full-time faculty members of Fairfield University have reached an agreement on the future of their collective salaries and benefits. On Friday, Sept. 6, faculty members gathered in the Kelley Center for a General Faculty meet-ing. During this congregation, they voted on the most recent Memo of Understanding (MOU) for the 2012-13 school year. The MOU serves as "a contractual document that specifies all faculty compensa-tion," as stated by Dr. Irene Mulvey, professor of mathematics and for-mer secretary of the General Fac-ulty. One hundred forty five faculty members voted in favor of the new MOU, with 70 voting against it and two citing abstention. With an ap-proximate 2-1 vote, the MOU is considered to be approved by the General Faculty. Fr. Paul Fitzgerald, a member of the administration, expressed positivity towards this latest oc-currence. "I was pleased to see that the faculty voted to accept the MOU that was the result of colle-gial conversations between elected representatives of the faculty and appointed members of the admin-istration," he said. Although some faculty mem-bers did not agree with the new standards laid down by the revised MOU, the general disapproval is less than that of the previous MOU meeting held on April 27, in which 185 faculty members voted against the version in review at the time. So why was it rejected in the first place? In MOU of the 2011- 2012 school year, the administra-tion promised to maintain the fac-ulty's compensation rank within the 95th percentile. Since its introduction in 1994, this standard of compensation is meant to serve as a means of eco-nomic security for faculty mem-bers. In a previous Mirror article, Mulvey described this benchmark as a "standard of our profession since it compares our compensa-tion with other schools in our cat-egory." In the original version of the 2012-13 MOU, the administration cited its intent to distance itself from this benchmark, which lead to its unanimous rejection by a General Faculty vote. Fitzgerald explained his un-derstanding of this situation: "The past few years have been difficult for most every member of the Fair-field University community - fac-ulty, staff and students. We have all sought to prioritize students, al-locating additional financial aid to those whose family financial situ-ations deteriorated significantly. We also limited the tuition increase this past year to a figure below the rate of inflation." In the aftermath ofthe rejected MOU last April, faculty members and students gathered on May 9 to MOU I t>A&te§ Connect with us online! Fairfield Mirror
Object Description
Title | Mirror - Vol. 38, No. 01 - September 12, 2012 |
Date | September 12 2012 |
Description | The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online. |
Notes | A timeline for Fairfield University student newspapers is as follows: The Tentative, Nov. 7, 1947 - Dec. 19, 1947; The Fulcrum, Jan. 9, 1948 - May 20, 1949; The Stag, Sept. 23, 1949 - May 6, 1970; The University Voice, Oct. 1, 1970 - May 11, 1977; The Fairfield Free Press & Review, Sept. 10, 1970 - Apr. 24, 1975; The Fairfield Mirror, Sept. 22, 1977 - present. |
Type of Document | Newspaper |
Original Format | Newsprint; color; ill.; 11.5 x 17 in. |
Digital Specifications | These images exist as archived TIFFs, JPEGs and one or more PDF versions for general use. Digitized by Creekside Digital through the LYRASIS group. |
Publisher | Fairfield University |
Place of Publication | Fairfield, Conn. |
Source | Fairfield University Archives and Special Collections |
Copyright Information | Fairfield University reserves all rights to this resource which is provided here for educational and/or non-commercial purposes only. |
Identifier | MIR20120912 |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
SearchData | I1 THE (^MIRROR Week of September 12,2012 • Vol. 38, Iss 1 • The Reflection ofFairfield • Independent Student Newspaper of Fairfield University Fairfield U car fire victim still in critical condition BY LOAN LE EXECUTIVE EDITOR A Fairfield University student remains in critical condition after being badly burned in a car fire. Part-time student Justin Hervey, 23, of Armonk, N.Y., was rushed to Bridgeport Hospital last Thursday evening after he and his Chevrolet Tahoe caught fire near Tunxis Hill Park in Fairfield, Conn. According to a Connecticut Postarticle, a Littie League baseball game was in progress when coach-es and parents noticed Hervey on fire near the field. Hervey had pulled into the parking lot when the car started having trouble. Coaches immediately rushed over and tried to extinguish the flames. This quick thinking was "heroic and should be applauded," said Assistant Fire Chief Scott Bis-son in the article. Hervey was still conscious when emergency personnel ar-rived on scene. As of late Tuesday night, Hervey's condition remains criti-cal, according to Bridgeport Hos-pital spokesperson John Cappiel-lo. Hervey's sister, Stephanie Hervey '13, said that her family is hoping for the best. "He's still in critical condition," she said. "He will be for a few months, but. . . he's pulling through right now so hopefully he will continue to do so." Word about Hervey's condi-tion spread to the University com-munity the day after the incident. In an email released to the community on Friday, Vice Presi-dent for Student Affairs Thomas Pellegrino wrote: "We are moni-toring his situation closely and University staff members have ex-tended support to his family, who is with him at this time." Pellegrino also offered students and faculty counseling options. Because the accident is cur-rently under investigation, little Stephen Krauchick/Doingitlocal.com Investigations are still underway regarding the cause of the fire that resulted in a Fairfield student's serious injury. information about the cause of the fire is available, according to a Fairfield Fire Department official. However, in a Hartford Courant ar-ticle, Sergeant Suzanne Lussier, a Fairfield Police spokesperson, said that the fire originated in the pas-senger compartment of Hervey's car. Stephanie called Hervey the "shining star" of the family and "the best brother I could have ever asked for." Hervey's family asked that people continue to pray for him. Fairfield University remembers 9/11 SEPTEMBER 111 PAGE 3 Jeaninne Nocera/The Mirror 3r @MirrorFairfield fairfieldmirror.com MOU approved BY MARTIN O'SULLIVAN EDITOR-IN-CHIEF After months of debate and protest, full-time faculty members of Fairfield University have reached an agreement on the future of their collective salaries and benefits. On Friday, Sept. 6, faculty members gathered in the Kelley Center for a General Faculty meet-ing. During this congregation, they voted on the most recent Memo of Understanding (MOU) for the 2012-13 school year. The MOU serves as "a contractual document that specifies all faculty compensa-tion," as stated by Dr. Irene Mulvey, professor of mathematics and for-mer secretary of the General Fac-ulty. One hundred forty five faculty members voted in favor of the new MOU, with 70 voting against it and two citing abstention. With an ap-proximate 2-1 vote, the MOU is considered to be approved by the General Faculty. Fr. Paul Fitzgerald, a member of the administration, expressed positivity towards this latest oc-currence. "I was pleased to see that the faculty voted to accept the MOU that was the result of colle-gial conversations between elected representatives of the faculty and appointed members of the admin-istration," he said. Although some faculty mem-bers did not agree with the new standards laid down by the revised MOU, the general disapproval is less than that of the previous MOU meeting held on April 27, in which 185 faculty members voted against the version in review at the time. So why was it rejected in the first place? In MOU of the 2011- 2012 school year, the administra-tion promised to maintain the fac-ulty's compensation rank within the 95th percentile. Since its introduction in 1994, this standard of compensation is meant to serve as a means of eco-nomic security for faculty mem-bers. In a previous Mirror article, Mulvey described this benchmark as a "standard of our profession since it compares our compensa-tion with other schools in our cat-egory." In the original version of the 2012-13 MOU, the administration cited its intent to distance itself from this benchmark, which lead to its unanimous rejection by a General Faculty vote. Fitzgerald explained his un-derstanding of this situation: "The past few years have been difficult for most every member of the Fair-field University community - fac-ulty, staff and students. We have all sought to prioritize students, al-locating additional financial aid to those whose family financial situ-ations deteriorated significantly. We also limited the tuition increase this past year to a figure below the rate of inflation." In the aftermath ofthe rejected MOU last April, faculty members and students gathered on May 9 to MOU I t>A&te§ Connect with us online! Fairfield Mirror |